Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

Case of the Missing State Reports

/
The Division of Health Care Finance and Policy (DHCFP) plays…

BCBSF of MA and Health Affairs Spinning the MA Reform

/
The Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Massachusetts (BCBSF)…

Are We Fighting Health Care Costs or Health Care Spending?

/
Liberal blogger Matt Yglesias over at Slate recently made…

A Deeper Dive into the Mass Health Reform Waiver & Why it Matters to the Future of the ACA

/
On December 20th, Governor Deval Patrick, and the entire Massachusetts…

Will 2012 be the year of the e-patient?

/
Dave deBronkart gave an interesting talk at a TED conference…

Mass and Feds Cut a Deal on Medicaid Waiver

/
This afternoon the Patrick Administration announced a new deal…

What will 2012 Look Like for Health Care?

/
I was recently asked by a reporter for some trends that I expect…

Will Mass Set up a Basic Health Plan under ACA?

/
The Connector held its annual retreat this past weekend, and…

Will the ACA Bankrupt the Mass Connector?

/
The Connector held its annual retreat this past weekend, and…

Obamacare Means Big Changes for Romneycare

/
The Connector held its annual retreat this past weekend, and…

The Connector Supports President Obama’s Reelection?

/
The Connector held its annual retreat this past weekend, and…

Session 6 -CMS & Mass Marriage Counseling

/
Today marks the 6th extension granted to the Commonwealth for…

Obama Admin Rethinking Massachusetts Model? Part 2

/
My now monthly blog post wondering if there will be agreement…

Patrick Admin’s Misdiagnosis on ACA Transparency

/
This post was co-written by Michael Morisy. During this year’s…

Are ACOs designed to care for grandparents also good for their grandkids?

/
This op-ed ran in the Boston Business Journal Friday September…