Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

MA Goes For Top-down Health Care Policies

/
Even as “Massachusetts Health Care 2.0” legislation moves to the Governor’s desk for signing, and with it the heavy hand of top-down policies, individuals and companies in many other states are adopting market-based solutions.

ACA Impact on Mass, Part 1: Low-income Residents will Pay More for Healthcare and Insurance

/
Affordability/ Subsidy levels for Low-income: How much will individuals…

How SCOTUS ACA/Obamacare Ruling Impacts Mass

/
Most of the press coverage has focused on the political angle…

Pulling Back the Curtain on Beacon Hill’s “Healthcare Reform 2.0”

/
T-minus 13 days until the end of the legislative session and…

Jon Gruber’s RomneyCare/ObamaCare False Narrative

/
This morning, Steve LeBlanc of the Associated Press has another…

Are Fewer People in MA Paying the Indiv Mandate Penalty?

/
Since the Supreme Court upheld the ACA/Obamacare, there has…

Pioneer Press Release on SCOTUS ACA Ruling

/
The Way Forward: Despite Supreme Court Ruling, New Start Needed…

The Myth of Cost Control Legislation

/
The House passed their version of "cost control" last night in…

Guide to Mass Payment Reform Amendments: Sex Ed, Podiatry, and Acupuncture

/
Find me on twitter: @josharchambault For those following at…

Mass House Pulls a “Charlie Brown” on Payment Reform Redraft

/
The Massachusetts House rushed the release of their payment…

Video: But Will The Cost-Cutting Bills Really Save Money?

/
The debate on Beacon Hill is heating up on payment reform legislation,…

Will Beacon Hill’s Payment Reform Work?

/
Pioneer Institute’s Health Care Policy Director Josh Archambault…

Is Maine Leading the Way on Health Care?

/
The Commonwealth is currently debating greater government intervention…