Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

Doc Gives Grim Diagnosis to “HCR II” in MA

/
WBUR's CommonHealth blog posted an interview with Dr. Wayne…

Mass Takes a Pass on HSAs

/
America's Health Insurance Plans (AHIP) released a report on…

Beacon Hill’s Magical Mystery Medicaid Savings

/
As the Senate and House work to reconcile their respective versions…

MA Public Opinion of RomneyCare

/
Kay Lazar had an interesting piece in The Boston Globe on a…

More Bad News for Governor’s Regulatory Regime for Payment Reform

/
A Washington Post article today is sure to influence the debate…

Is Medicaid (MassHealth) Preventing the Poor from Breaking out of Addiction?

/
Lawrence Harmon of The Boston Globe had a very interesting…

Gov. Patrick’s Regulatory Regime for Payment Reform

/
This was the testimony I submitted today to the Joint Committee…

Maine Moving on Health Care

/
An interesting experiment is about to be unleashed in one of…

Massachusetts Medicaid “Savings” in Trouble?

/
The New York Times reports In a new effort to increase access…

Connector Saving Taxpayer Money

/
On this blog-- and in the press-- I have often been critical…

Governor Deval Patrick’s Missing Chapter on Transparency

/
Governor Deval Patrick's new autobiography, "A Reason to Believe:…

Gov Patrick Confused on Economics on “Daily Show”

/
Governor Patrick was on Comedy Central's "Daily Show" Tuesday…

Romney Gets ALL the Credit for RomneyCare?

/
Today is the 5th anniversary of the signing of Chapter 58 (health…

Labor leader in a glass house

/
Talk about throwing stones from a glass house. Robert Haynes,…

Gilded benefits clash with ‘fair share’

/
Public employee unions leaders love to talk about “fair share”…