Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on

LinkedIn

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

I Pledge My Faith in Bureaucracy- Mass Health Reform II

2 Comments

May 7, 2012

The House version of payment reform creates a new mega agency,…

Many Unanswered Questions On Payment Reform

0 Comments

May 4, 2012

The next act of the Massachusetts health care reform drama…

If Only Governor Patrick Knew What His Medicaid Office Was Up To

0 Comments

April 25, 2012

While Governor Patrick has been pleading with the Legislature…

Is Romneycare A Budget Buster?

2 Comments

April 17, 2012

The Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation (MTF) put out a report…

News Flash: Gruber and McDonough are Political

0 Comments

April 13, 2012

Jonathan Gruber and John McDonough are widely quoted in the media…

How Much Do Same-Sex Marriage & Health Care Overlap Constitutionally?

0 Comments

April 10, 2012

Socially liberal commentators opine against some conservative’s…

Applying Finance to Health Care: ROI of Wellness Programs

0 Comments

April 6, 2012

A new report from Health Fairs Direct, a corporate health and…

WSJ on “The Great Experiment” in Health Care

0 Comments

March 23, 2012

Kim Strassel of the Wall Street Journal($) wrote on Pioneer's…

WITH FEDERAL HEALTH LAW FACING SUPREME COURT TEST, NEW BOOK OFFERS ALTERNATIVE

March 13, 2012

Pioneer's new book, The Great Experiment, proposes that the states take the lead in health-care reform, as Massachusetts did in 2006, and that Washington facilitate the transition, rather than try to dictate every move.