Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

A Fair and Cost Effective Tort System for Health Care

New study calls for comprehensive tort reform to address rise in number and average cost of malpractice payouts, and increase in insurance premiums, up by 63% in 2009 since 2001

Does Your Doctor Know How Much That Costs?

/
A local group  (run by a former classmate of mine) is accepting…

Obama Admin Rethinking Massachusetts Model?

/
The summer has led to little news from the Legislature and…

Governor, When is Excessiveness Excessive?

/
The state senate is trying to decide whether to override the…

Wishful Thinking On Romneycare & Obamacare for Employers

/
Over at the left-of-center blog The Incidental Economist, Austin…

Massachusetts is 1st in the Nation on Health Care Cost!

/
However, this gold medal is one we wish we could return. Kaiser…

Do you feel safer in a hospital or on an airplane?

/
The World Health Organization released a report recently that…

Their Solution is Dilution

/
If there was any confusion about what Massachusetts public employee…

Feds Crapping Away Health $ and Increasing Deficit

/
GAO (Government Accountability Office) will release a report…

Vermont Single-Payer Plan Full of Holes

/
The Blue Cross Blue Shield Foundation of Massachusetts held a…

Watch Me Pull A Rabbit Out of My Hat

/
Again? Ruffle up my sleeve. Presto. The Great and Good…

Beacon Hill’s Budget MassHealth Mirage

/
Today the Legislature will vote on the final state budget. I…

HCFA & GBIO’s Misdiagnosis

/
Health Care for All and the Greater Boston Interfaith Organization…

Misinformation About Massachusetts Reform from the Left

/
Jonathan Cohn, Senior Editor of The New Republic tries to undercut…

Business Solutions to the Health Care Crunch in the Bay State

New report presents case studies of companies that have successfully controlled health care spending through proven strategies