Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

ACA Premium Roller Coaster for Small Business Coming to Massachusetts

/
A handful of owners of small companies in the Commonwealth…

60% of MA Docs Will Not Meet Ch224 Electronic Medical Record Mandate

/
Putting aside a lengthy discussion about the merits of and cost…

New “Grace Period” For ACA Implementation in Mass

/
These are strange days in healthcare. Even the Boston Globe is…

Will Mass Unmerge Insurance Marketplace Because of ACA?

/
I have written numerous times about the impact that the ACA…

As Federal Health Law Turns Three, We Should Leverage The Power of Federalism

/
As the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA, aka ObamaCare)…

Pioneer Requests Report That Predicts ACA’s “Extreme Premium Increases”

/
Pioneer Files Request for the Administration to Release Its Report…

Health Policy Commission Starts to Pick Winners and Losers

/
In a feared (put predicted) outcome, the newly formed Health…

Revolving Door on Beacon Hill, Healthcare Edition

/
It often goes unreported, but Beacon Hill does have a wide revolving door…

Who Controls Health Care Costs? Experts Debate

This week, Pioneer hosted its annual Hewitt Health Care Lecture,…

5 Takeaways from the Employer Healthcare Survey in Massachusetts

/
CHIA, the healthcare data agency for the Commonwealth, finally…

Data Neglect at Massachusetts’s Data Agency (CHIA/DHCFP)

/
The agency responsible for much of the publicly available data…

Mass Connector Up to $180 Million to Change Tires on the Exchange

/
The Boston Globe reported on its website yesterday that the…

What is ahead for Chapter 224 in 2013

/
In an effort to achieve greater transparency, I decided…