Opportunity For MBTA Expansion | MBTA Ferry Service’s Performance

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on

LinkedIn

Read press coverage of this report in the Boston Herald: Study suggests MBTA float ferry service expansion and Editorial: “Ferrying off to work“; The Boston Globe: “Look to the harbor to ease Boston’s transportation woes,” “Steady stream of studies fuel transportation debates,” and here; The Boston Business Journal: “Seaport ferry, funded by business, would be open to public“; and State House News Service: “SENATE REPORT ASSERTS PUBLIC DISSATISFIED WITH MASS. TRANSPORTATION“; The Lynn Daily Item: “LYNN FERRY’S FUTURE BUOYED BY REPORT”; and The Salem News: “Our view: Ferry expansion can help ease traffic woes”

Service has low capital costs, is cost effective by a number of measures, and could be an inexpensive channel to address critical transit needs in the region

BOSTON – A comprehensive study of the MBTA ferry service’s performance as a transit mode and how it compares to other ferry operators nationwide offers useful insights for policy discussion on future water transportation in Massachusetts Bay, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute. The findings suggest additional ferry service could provide an opportunity for the cash-strapped MBTA to expand service without the enormous upfront investment required to extend capital-intensive heavy, light, and/or commuter rail lines.

Download "Is it time to expand water transportation in Greater Boston?”

“Despite relatively high operating expenses by some measures, ferry service is overall quite cost effective compared to other MBTA service modes,” said Pioneer Institute Research Director Greg Sullivan, who co-authored “Is it time to expand water transportation in Greater Boston?” with Pioneer Research and Policy Associate Matthew Blackbourn.

MBTA ferry service makes stops in Hingham, Hull, Charlestown, downtown Boston, and at Logan Airport. The report also explores recent water transportation initiatives in a number of coastal communities on the north and south shores. With over 1.3 million trips per year, the MBTA ferry makes up a small percentage of T ridership—but the service is critical to coastal communities that lack other transit options.

In 2015, the T ferry recovered more of its costs through fares (68 percent) than any other MBTA service mode. It also had the highest fare revenue per passenger mile and per unlinked trip, and was one of the most popular modes among its users. A big reason for its popularity is that the ferry boasts the best on-time performance of any T transit option.

Between 2002 and 2015, ferry service required the least capital investment of any MBTA transit mode. It also required the lowest subsidy per passenger mile—$0.41—second to the commuter rail ($0.38) over the same timeframe, according to analysis that factors in debt service on capital expenses and builds on previous MBTA analysis.

This impressive efficiency comes in spite of having high operating costs by some measures, including several commonly used transit performance metrics. In 2015, ferry service had the highest operating expenses per vehicle mile, revenue hour, and unlinked passenger trip of any MBTA mode. It also had higher operating expenses per passenger mile than the average of all T service modes analyzed.

Blackbourn and Sullivan compared MBTA ferry service to five other ferry operators – the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District and San Francisco Bay Area Water Emergency Transportation Authority in the Bay Area; Greater New York City’s Port Imperial Ferry Corporation and BillyBey Ferry Company LLC; and the King County Ferry District in Seattle – that were deemed suitable peers through use of the Integrated National Transit Database Analysis System’s peer selection tool.

MBTA water transportation was relatively cost effective compared to its peers, scoring in the top three out of the six operators on four of six measures, although it ranked last in terms of trips per revenue hour and per revenue mile.

Two of the five peer operators (Port Imperial and BillyBey) are for-profit companies. Among the public operators, the MBTA had the highest fare recovery ratio.

The MBTA has signaled its recognition of water transportation’s potential to reduce congestion and deliver environmental benefits. Despite comprising a tiny percentage of its overall operations, the T’s FY2015-2019 Capital Investment Program dedicates $42 million to ferry service, or about 1 percent of overall capital expenditures.

Gregory W. Sullivan is Pioneer’s Research Director. Prior to joining Pioneer, Sullivan served two five-year terms as Inspector General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, and was a 17-year member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. Greg is a Certified Fraud Investigator, and holds degrees from Harvard College, The Kennedy School of Public Administration, and the Sloan School at MIT.

Matthew Blackbourn is Pioneer’s Research & Policy Associate. He has led projects for PioneerPublic, PioneerOpportunity, and PioneerHealth, and assists with managing the organization’s crowdsourcing initiative, the Better Government Competition. He holds a Bachelor of Arts from Tulane University.

About Pioneer

Pioneer Institute is an independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization that seeks to improve the quality of life in Massachusetts through civic discourse and intellectually rigorous, data-driven public policy solutions based on free market principles, individual liberty and responsibility, and the ideal of effective, limited and accountable government.

Get Updates on Our Transportation Research

Study Finds Pension Obligation Bonds Could Worsen T Retirement Fund’s Financial Woes

June 21, 2022

A new study published by Pioneer Institute finds that issuing pension obligation bonds (POBs) to refinance $360 million of the MBTA Retirement Fund’s (MBTARF’s) $1.3 billion unfunded pension liability would only compound the T’s already serious financial risks.

Study Documents The Design Challenges, Contracting Issues, And Delays Facing New MBTA Fare Collection System

May 19, 2022

This new study unearths previously unseen communications between the MBTA and its contractors, showing that the MBTA’s efforts to modernize its fare collection system, including allowing payments with credit cards and bringing “tap and go” technology to Commuter Rail and ferry lines, was riddled with technological challenges and difficulties overseeing contractors as early as 2019, culminating in a 3-year delay to the project’s full implementation.

Study Finds Bus Rapid Transit Can Offer Cost-Effective Benefits

February 8, 2022

Bus rapid transit (BRT) incorporates unique features such as dedicated lanes to provide reliable and cost-effective service while reducing congestion and its detrimental environmental impacts, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Study Raises Concern That Annual T Fare Evasion Costs Could Rise By More Than $30 Million Under AFC 2.0

January 19, 2022

According to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the MBTA’s $935.4 million fare collection system (AFC 2.0) that is scheduled to be implemented in 2023 will reduce fare evasion by $35 million over a decade. But the T announced in 2021 that evasion could actually increase by up to $30 million under AFC 2.0, and now a Pioneer Institute study warns that insufficient fare enforcement could drive that figure even higher under the new system.

Pioneer Applauds MassDOT for Allston Project All At-Grade Plan

September 30, 2021

Pioneer Institute applauds the Massachusetts Department of Transportation (Mass DOT) for its decision to move forward with an all at-grade design for the “throat” area as part of the massive $1.7 billion Allston I-90 Interchange project announced yesterday by State Secretary of Transportation Jamey Tesler. Pioneer had proposed that MassDOT should revise its Scoping Report on the I-90 Allston Multimodal Project and recommend an additional option - a modified at-grade option for the throat area - to the Federal Highway Administration.

Open Letter: Extend the Term of the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board

May 26, 2021

Read Pioneer Institute's Open Letter urging policymakers to extend the term of the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB), which is currently scheduled to sunset at the end of June. The Letter also calls for the Control Board to continue to be made up of transit experts rather than political appointees, and recommends that an independent audit office be created that reports directly to the FMCB.

Pioneer Institute Statement on MBTA Service Cuts

November 20, 2020

Even as MBTA ridership and revenue have been gutted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the system remains a lifeline for so many residents in the Greater Boston area, especially those working in essential services like health care or in industries most impacted by the pandemic such as the restaurant sector. Facing a crisis of this magnitude, T leadership must first do its all to rethink how it delivers services before reflexively making cuts.

COVID-19 Silver Lining: MBTA Takes Advantage of Ridership Lull to Accelerate $8.5 Billion Modernization Program

July 30, 2020

Pioneer Institute congratulates the Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) and MBTA management for taking advantage of the precipitous ridership declines due to the COVID pandemic to dramatically accelerate ongoing construction projects.

Survey Suggests Demand for Telecommuting After COVID-19 Crisis

May 26, 2020

Citing an avoidance of the commute and more flexible scheduling, nearly 63 percent of respondents to Pioneer Institute’s survey, “Will You Commute To Work When The COVID-19 Crisis Is Over?” expressed a preference to work from home one day a week, and a plurality preferred two to three days a week, even after a COVID-19 vaccine is available. Respondents cite social isolation as the biggest drawback of remote work. The survey was conducted from April 22nd to May 15th, and received responses from over 700 individuals.

Study Highlights Transit Agency Best Practices in Response to COVID-19

April 23, 2020

The MBTA is taking a number of important steps to mitigate risks associated with the coronavirus, but some transit agencies around the country - from Philadelphia to San Francisco - have done significantly more, according to a new study that highlights the best practices of U.S. transit systems in response to COVID-19.

A Control Board Equipped for the Next Phase of MBTA Reform

January 27, 2020

In a new policy brief out today, Pioneer Institute calls on the Massachusetts Legislature to extend the life of the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board beyond the current fiscal year ending on June 30, and adjust it to address the agency's new challenges.

Pioneer Urges MassDOT to Reconsider At-Grade Throat Option for I-90 Allston Multimodal Project

December 10, 2019

Pioneer's new Public Comment calls on the Massachusetts Department of Transportation to revise its Scoping Report on the I-90 Allston Multimodal Project and recommend an additional option to the Federal Highway Administration.

Study Finds Revived Merit Rating Board Taking Steps to Carry Out Statutorily Mandated Duties

October 10, 2019

The Merit Rating Board’s recent adoption of a regular meeting schedule, and related resolutions, are important steps in light of that Board’s 1976 governing statute.

Study Proposes “Marshall Plan” for Attracting and Retaining Talent Needed to Modernize the MBTA

October 7, 2019

Better hiring practices and internal organization, external resources…

Pioneer Institute Announces Winner of 29th Annual Better Government Competition

September 16, 2019

Pioneer Institute is pleased to announce that Los Angeles Country Metropolitan Transportation Authority (LA Metro)’s program, “Operation Farm Team: Global Transportation Infrastructure Workforce Initiative” is the winner of the 29th annual Better Government Competition. The theme of the 2019 contest was, “Moving People, Moving Goods, Moving Forward,” focusing on innovations that prepare America for the future of transportation.

Study: Ferry Service Could Provide Opportunity for MBTA Expansion without Huge Upfront Costs