Editorial Staff

Study Documents The Design Challenges, Contracting Issues, And Delays Facing New MBTA Fare Collection System

/in , , , , , /by Editorial Staff
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

MBTA’s Aggressive Hiring Tactics Have Paid Off, But Oversight Concerns Remain

BOSTON – Public records compiled by Pioneer Institute show that the MBTA’s efforts to modernize its fare collection system, including allowing payments with credit cards and bringing “tap and go” technology to commuter rail and ferry lines, were riddled with technological challenges and difficulties overseeing contractors as early as 2019, culminating in a three-year delay to the project’s full implementation and a nearly 30 percent increase in project costs.

At one point, the MBTA sent a breach of contract letter to OpCo, the corporation tasked with completing and operating the new system, but rescinded it a couple of months later.

These details and more are included in a new study from Pioneer Institute, The MBTA’s Automated Fare Collection Modernization Contract: Over-Budget And Behind Schedule, But Now Back On Track. The study unearths previously unseen communications between the MBTA and its contractors, as well as highlighting key insights regarding the MBTA’s administrative capacity and hiring efforts needed to oversee the project’s implementation.

“The design challenges with this proposal were always clear,” said Greg Sullivan, Pioneer Institute’s Research Director and a co-author of the study with Andrew Mikula. “But there are lingering questions over the T’s ability to hold OpCo’s feet to the fire and prevent costs from escalating further.”

In June 2020, the MBTA renegotiated the initial contract, adding $211 million to the previous $723 million price tag for essentially the same scope of work. Originally scheduled to be fully operational in May 2021, the new fare collection system, called “AFC 2.0,” now has a targeted completion date of May 2024.

The 2020 contract renegotiation process occurred after a December 2019 public meeting made it clear that OpCo had fallen behind schedule in designing the hardware and software systems for the new fare collection technology. Shortly thereafter, the COVID-19 pandemic caused transit ridership in Greater Boston to plummet; as of February 2022 ridership on several modes of transit still hadn’t returned to half of pre-pandemic levels. The need to remain sensitive to a volatile public health crisis has exacerbated the challenges of implementing AFC 2.0 in a timely and cost-effective manner.

In the nearly two years until AFC 2.0 is fully operational, the MBTA has an enormous administrative burden to hold OpCo accountable to its nearly $1 billion contract. This is especially true as upgrades shift from a focus on improving access to actually creating new fare payment options. Without vigilant oversight, the T’s use of credit cards to pay for an MBTA trip has the potential to compromise enormous volumes of personal consumer data.

“Taxpayers deserve more transparency around why they’re on the hook for an additional $211 million after the 2020 contract was signed,” said Pioneer Executive Director Jim Stergios. “It’s clear that the T has made great strides in its preparedness for executing this project, but the details of a contract this large are of fervent public interest.”

The new study also highlights how the MBTA’s AFC 2.0 implementation delays have led to wasteful spending on other contracting work. This includes conducting expensive upgrades to ticket vending machine equipment that will be replaced in a couple of years.

About the Authors

Andrew Mikula is a former Economic Research Analyst at Pioneer Institute and current candidate for a Master’s degree in Urban Planning at Harvard University.

Gregory Sullivan is Pioneer’s Research Director. Prior to joining Pioneer, Sullivan served two five-year terms as Inspector General of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts and was a 17-year member of the Massachusetts House of Representatives. Greg holds degrees from Harvard College, The Kennedy School of Public Administration, and the Sloan School at MIT.

About Pioneer

Pioneer’s mission is to develop and communicate dynamic ideas that advance prosperity and a vibrant civic life in Massachusetts and beyond. Pioneer’s vision of success is a state and nation where our people can prosper and our society thrive because we enjoy world-class options in education, healthcare, transportation and economic opportunity, and where our government is limited, accountable and transparent. Pioneer values an America where our citizenry is well-educated and willing to test our beliefs based on facts and the free exchange of ideas, and committed to liberty, personal responsibility, and free enterprise.

Get Updates on Our Transportation Research

Related Posts

Study Finds Pension Obligation Bonds Could Worsen T Retirement Fund’s Financial Woes

A new study published by Pioneer Institute finds that issuing pension obligation bonds (POBs) to refinance $360 million of the MBTA Retirement Fund’s (MBTARF’s) $1.3 billion unfunded pension liability would only compound the T’s already serious financial risks.

Study Documents The Design Challenges, Contracting Issues, And Delays Facing New MBTA Fare Collection System

This new study unearths previously unseen communications between the MBTA and its contractors, showing that the MBTA’s efforts to modernize its fare collection system, including allowing payments with credit cards and bringing “tap and go” technology to Commuter Rail and ferry lines, was riddled with technological challenges and difficulties overseeing contractors as early as 2019, culminating in a 3-year delay to the project’s full implementation.

Study Finds Bus Rapid Transit Can Offer Cost-Effective Benefits

Bus rapid transit (BRT) incorporates unique features such as dedicated lanes to provide reliable and cost-effective service while reducing congestion and its detrimental environmental impacts, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Study Raises Concern That Annual T Fare Evasion Costs Could Rise By More Than $30 Million Under AFC 2.0

According to the Federal Transit Administration (FTA), the MBTA’s $935.4 million fare collection system (AFC 2.0) that is scheduled to be implemented in 2023 will reduce fare evasion by $35 million over a decade. But the T announced in 2021 that evasion could actually increase by up to $30 million under AFC 2.0, and now a Pioneer Institute study warns that insufficient fare enforcement could drive that figure even higher under the new system.

Open Letter: Extend the Term of the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board

Read Pioneer Institute's Open Letter urging policymakers to extend the term of the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB), which is currently scheduled to sunset at the end of June.  The Letter also calls for the Control Board to continue to be made up of transit experts rather than political appointees, and recommends that an independent audit office be created that reports directly to the FMCB.

Pioneer Institute Statement on MBTA Service Cuts

Even as MBTA ridership and revenue have been gutted by the COVID-19 pandemic, the system remains a lifeline for so many residents in the Greater Boston area, especially those working in essential services like health care or in industries most impacted by the pandemic such as the restaurant sector.  Facing a crisis of this magnitude, T leadership must first do its all to rethink how it delivers services before reflexively making cuts.

COVID-19 Silver Lining: MBTA Takes Advantage of Ridership Lull to Accelerate $8.5 Billion Modernization Program

Pioneer Institute congratulates the Fiscal and Management Control Board (FMCB) and MBTA management for taking advantage of the precipitous ridership declines due to the COVID pandemic to dramatically accelerate ongoing construction projects.

Survey Suggests Demand for Telecommuting After COVID-19 Crisis

Citing an avoidance of the commute and more flexible scheduling, nearly 63 percent of respondents to Pioneer Institute’s survey, “Will You Commute To Work When The COVID-19 Crisis Is Over?” expressed a preference to work from home one day a week, and a plurality preferred two to three days a week, even after a COVID-19 vaccine is available. Respondents cite social isolation as the biggest drawback of remote work. The survey was conducted from April 22nd to May 15th, and received responses from over 700 individuals.

Study Highlights Transit Agency Best Practices in Response to COVID-19

The MBTA is taking a number of important steps to mitigate risks associated with the coronavirus, but some transit agencies around the country - from Philadelphia to San Francisco - have done significantly more, according to a new study that highlights the best practices of U.S. transit systems in response to COVID-19.

A Control Board Equipped for the Next Phase of MBTA Reform

In a new policy brief out today, Pioneer Institute calls on the Massachusetts Legislature to extend the life of the MBTA’s Fiscal and Management Control Board beyond the current fiscal year ending on June 30, and adjust it to address the agency's new challenges.