Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

MA vs. US: Round 2: Employer Penalties

/
Sorry, It's been awhile. Although the MA reform was considered…

A novel way to present your resume

/
Jon Kingsdale, former executive director of the Commonwealth…

A missed opportunity to fix small business insurance

/
Small business insurance has been a mess in this state for a…

Auto insurance does not equal health insurance

/
What's wrong with a government mandate for health insurance?…

So whaddaya think about Sunday's vote?

/
Many thoughts but here are three key ones: 1) What a wasted…

Connecting with small businesses?

/
State House News Service (subscription required) reports that…

Opportunity for Coakley in March

/
While the Democratic party "commentariat" has had afield day…

Be Careful What You Ask For

/
When I read the informative report released by DHCFP and reported…

CPOE Initiative

/
In 2004, the Massachusetts Technology Collaborative (MTC), in…

Health Insurance Cost Control

/
The combined use of limited, or slective, provider networks and…

A National Market for Individual Health Insurance

/
Health insurance markets are regulated by the states under the…

Wellness Health Incentive Payment Program

/
Suitable healthcare should always involve an accountable partnership…

Overseas Surgery

/
So, I’ve heard about the increase in Americans seeking expensive…

Small Employers, there is something you can do.

/
Many people have received coverage via health care reform and…

Transparency — Bring it on

/
On Friday, my old agency released a report entitled “Measuring…