Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) that prohibits state governments from automatically deducting union dues from Medicaid payments intended for those caring for loved ones or relatives.

Prior to this action, 13 states (including Massachusetts) classified individuals who take care of relatives and/or loved ones as public employees. A 2014 rule gave unions the ability to collect dues from Medicaid payments made to these caregivers, supposedly to provide benefits including health insurance and skills training.

In an August 2018 comment jointly submitted with other think tanks, Pioneer wrote that allowing diversion of Medicaid funds to third parties, like unions, presents risk of abuse and may result in Medicaid funds being used “for purposes not sanctioned by the Social Security Act.”

Since 2006, collective bargaining agreements in Massachusetts have authorized and subsequently required payment of dues or agency fees for all personal care attendants (PCAs) employed by Medicaid beneficiaries. Eliminating this rule allows individuals to opt into union membership and dues-paying, and disallows automatic deduction of dues on behalf of those caring for relatives or loved ones.

Many organizations involved with this issue, including Pioneer, identified that the 2014 rule allowing “dues skimming” violated the Social Security Act, which says Medicaid payments must be paid directly to caregivers. In addition, given recent U.S. Supreme Court decisions in Harris v. Quinn and Janus v. AFSCME, the 2014 rule creates a First Amendment dilemma, since mandatory payments force people to support political causes favored by unions. Individuals who don’t want to support these causes shouldn’t be forced to join the union, pay dues, or, in this case, have dues “skimmed” from Medicaid payments.

Pioneer believes the new CMS rule is a step toward giving employees the freedom to choose whether to join unions and receive the associated benefits, and ensuring that Medicaid funds of this kind are used to support caregivers and their capacity to aid elderly and disabled members of society.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Recent Research:

Counterintuitive Thoughts on Healthcare Costs

/
Back in October, we released a paper on business costs in Massachusetts.…

Let the handwringing begin…

/
CVS has sought state permission to open MinuteClinics in a number…

What Glenn gets wrong – Ed Reform and progress (3 of 4)

/
I remember a rally in front of the State House when my daughter…

What Glenn glosses over – GIC and better coverage for teachers (2 of 4)

/
Odd that, in his letter to the Globe editor (6/30/07), Glenn…

Where Glenn Koocher agrees – GIC cost sharing (1 of 4)

/
In a letter to the Globe editor yesterday, it seems that Glenn…

They call it Pioneer Valley for a reason, 1

/
One of the standout winners at the 2007 Better Government Competition…

Tooting My Own Horn – Biotech Edition

/
Pioneer has had a lot to say about the Governor's biotech proposal…

Two-fer from the Globe

/
Yesterday's editorial in the Globe on the Governor's veering…

Baker-Levy Smackdown, Part Two

/
Paul Levy runs Beth Israel, an academic medical center (and a…

Who will improve our health care blues?

/
Today's Globe editorial lays out the health care riffs of the…

More budget minutiae

/
A close reading of the Outside Sections in the Senate Ways and…

BAKER – LEVY HEALTHCARE SMACKDOWN!!!!!

/
Ok, maybe that's a bit dramatic. Or a lot dramatic, but interesting…

Budget Minutiae – Part 2 of a 700 part series

/
More interesting fun with amendments and earmarks -- What if…

Rationalizing Health and Human Services

/
Author: Charles D. Baker, Jr. The proposal to rationalize…

An Economic History of Health Care in Massachusetts 1990-2000

/
Author: Jerome H. Grossman, M.D. This report examines the…