Mary Connaughton

Open Letter to MassDOT Board Regarding I-90 Allston Multimodal Project

/0 Comments/in , , , , , /by Mary Connaughton
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

June 22, 2020

Secretary Stephanie Pollack and Board of Directors

Massachusetts Department of Transportation

Re: I-90 Allston Multimodal Project, Boston, MA National Environmental Policy Act Review Scoping Report: All At-Grade Option and 8-lane Turnpike – Throat Area

Dear Secretary Pollack and Board,

Disruption is far too weak a word for what is coming to Metro-West commuters once the I-90 Allston multi-modal project gets underway in 2022. Long-term lane reductions along the turnpike stretching between Boston University and the Charles River will upend automobile travel to and from Boston.

Commuters, whose lives are going to be uprooted for at least a decade, should get the benefit of seeing cost differentials for both construction and long-term maintenance as well as project durations for alternative infrastructure design options. Therefore, it is in the public’s best interest to consider all at-grade option for the throat area of the I-90 Multimodal Project.

Pioneer Institute recommends that MassDOT revise its Scoping Report. Specifically, we recommend the addition of a modified at-grade option for I-90 and Soldiers Field Road in the throat area that includes the Paul Dudley White bicycle and pedestrian path (PDW) as a bridge over the river 30 to 40 feet from the riverbank.  Such an option would provide for parkland with neighborhood access or for the PDW to be positioned just north of Soldiers Field Road over the river’s edge (such positioning may require more narrow travel lanes and shoulders).

Additionally, the Institute

  1. Strongly advises against a reduction in the number of lanes on the turnpike. The toll-payers will likely be paying for the lion’s share of the project. Their forbearance with the disruptions of the construction period and their bearing the financial burden of paying for the project should not be rewarded with a design that reduces lane capacity below what it currently is.
  2. Urges MassDOT to maintain options to further improve the turnpike as technologies become available that will reduce congestion or enhance public safety.
  3. Urges that work on the turnpike structures over route 128 be undertaken before the start of the Allston project in order to avoid concurrent projects and thereby compound traffic woes. Those bridges are about eight years older than the BU viaduct, are also structurally deficient and in dire need of repair.
  4. Urges that Worcester Line service be ramped up to accommodate greater ridership during the construction period. Framingham and other points west have long endured snarled traffic due to at-grade crossings and increasing service will make traffic in downtown areas more severe. Pioneer recommends that at-grade crossings in the corridor be addressed concurrently with the planning of the I-90 Allston project.
  5. Supports a traffic study relative of measures and design changes to calm traffic on Soldiers Field Road so that policymakers have the information on the impact of eliminating lane capacity on routine commuters, affected towns, Memorial Drive, secondary roads and other side streets in the area.

Finally, Pioneer Institute recommends that the following additional actions be considered for mitigation:

  1. Maintain two-track Worcester Line service throughout the construction period
  2. Begin a pilot project to electrify key areas of the Worcester Line to improve commutes and increase ridership
  3. River restoration measures should consider co-location of other public benefits such as stormwater mitigation and public access. Due to the project’s close proximity and significant impact on the Charles River and surrounding parklands, river restoration should be a key element of the project.
  4. End plans for the West Station layover facility to avoid additional traffic on the Worcester Line
  5. Build platforms for completely level boarding at more commuter rail stations, beginning with Back Bay Station, to reduce dwell time
  6. Expedite certain proposed design upgrades for Newton’s commuter rail stops to improve access and facilitate faster peak-hour boarding
  7. Facilitate partnerships among the MBTA, communities, and private firms to increase parking capacity during project construction near the Green Line, Commuter Rail, and bus stations in the I-90 corridor
  8. Provide transparency on the plan to provide Kendall Square transit access from West Station to benefit commuters from the west
  9. Where practical, permanently expand station parking lots or consider higher-capacity garages
  10. Provide MBTA bus service for the I-90 corridor from Park and Ride lots to Boston during construction
  11. Conduct a feasibility study for improving the Newton Corner exit interchange, addressing design deficiencies of exit ramps and preventing traffic spillover onto I-90
  12. Encourage pedestrian and bicycle infrastructure improvements near existing Worcester Line and Green Line stations
  13. Increase MBTA coordination with the MetroWest Regional Transit Authority and the Worcester Regional Transit Authority, including expanded service during construction
  14. Install electronic speed limit signs that adjust to traffic conditions, maximizing road efficiency
  15. Create numerous opportunities for western commuters to provide feedback to MassDOT on these mitigation efforts, including public meetings, special web forums, and outreach efforts
  16. Ensure that residents from MetroWest and Central Massachusetts are represented on the MassDOT board throughout the construction period
  17. Establish the finance plan for the project in an open and transparent manner and form a finance plan task force with toll payer and other public representation
  18. Seek extensive federal funding for the project and continue to work with private organizations to help fund the project

Sincerely,

 

Mary Z. Connaughton, Director of Government Transparency

 

James Stergios, Executive Director

 

cc: Jeffrey McEwen, Regional Division Administrator, FHWA

cc: Steve Poftak, MBTA General Manager

 

Get Updates on Our Transportation Research

How Public Transportation’s Efficiency Changed During Covid

The MBTA's efficiency plummeted during Covid; as people chose either personal transportation or personal work, the MBTA lost significant ridership. However, it maintained its vehicle fleet and the depth of its services even as its operating cost per passenger mile increased dramatically.

The MBTA’s Aging Infrastructure: Improvements have Failed to Materialize for the T

Reform for the MBTA has long been a priority for Massachusetts government. However, the MBTA still struggles to grow its ridership and revenue, as its infrastructure grows increasingly in need of repair.

Cheap, Efficient, Effective: The Lessons from the PVTA and WRTA

The MBTA is recognized as one of the best transit systems in the nation. It's not perfect, however: comparisons to other Massachusetts transit systems can indicate the MBTA's flaws and highlight the regional authorities' strengths.

Fare-Free Public Transit in Boston: A Holistic View

In recent years, ridership on bus routes which run through low-income areas has increased due to programs which have eliminated fares on those routes. With some politicians looking to expand this to all Boston transportation, it is important to remember that while public transit is good for society, it is not a public good.

MBTA retirement fund is headed for a financial reckoning

The new MBTA Retirement Fund Actuarial Valuation Report shows the fund is only about 51 percent funded. In 2006, it was 94 percent funded. A “death spiral” generally accelerates when retirement system funding dips below 50 percent.

Installing bike and bus lanes requires public debate

The problem isn’t with the concept of bike lanes but, rather, the lack of public conversation or transparency. Municipal governments are changing the infrastructure and character of entire neighborhoods and small commercial centers with little input from those most affected.

Public Comment on Allston Multimodal Project

We remain pleased with the decision of MassDOT to concentrate its efforts on the all at-grade option for the throat area of the Allston Multimodal Project as recommend by Pioneer Institute and others. However, we are deeply concerned that the construction will negatively impact commuters coming into Boston from points west.

MBTA’s Runaway Crisis: Legacy of Neglect Demands Comprehensive Reform

This week on Hubwonk, host Joe Selvaggi talks with Andrew Bagley, Vice President for Policy and Research at Massachusetts Taxpayers Foundation, about their recent report entitled, The MBTA Crisis is Complicated - Fixing It Will Be Too, diving into the details on why the T is in crisis and what the public must demand of policy makers to get it back on track.

The Green Line Extension Project Progress and Finances

0 Comments
/
Earlier this month, a Boston Globe article informed Boston residents…

Looming Budget Crisis Reveals MBTA’s Dependency on Federal Funds

0 Comments
/
The MBTA is about to lose federal funding at a critical moment when ridership has not yet recovered. Will the state make up the difference?

Study Finds Pension Obligation Bonds Could Worsen T Retirement Fund’s Financial Woes

A new study published by Pioneer Institute finds that issuing pension obligation bonds (POBs) to refinance $360 million of the MBTA Retirement Fund’s (MBTARF’s) $1.3 billion unfunded pension liability would only compound the T’s already serious financial risks.