No Clear Correlation Between Fare Revenue and Ridership

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

In recent weeks, many MBTA riders have expressed frustration about the T’s recent fare hike. In fact, some riders are volunteering to stand on platforms and lead a conversation about what riders can do to roll back the hike. However, the T is unlikely to budge. Even when ridership declines for a period, fare revenue continues to climb.

The last three fare hikes occurred in 2012, 2014, and 2016. While all three led to a decrease in unlinked passenger trips the following year, they generated an increase in fare revenue. In fact, fare revenue increased every year from 2007-2017, with the exception of 2010. Further, the largest increase in fare revenue actually came in a year in which ridership declined. According to Pioneer Institute’s MBTAAnalysis.com, from 2012 to 2013, fare revenue increased by 19.7% even as ridership decreased by 1.6%. Moreover, when ridership grew by 7% in 2011, its largest increase between 2007 and 2017, fare revenue only rose by 2.2%. When the T implements Automated Fare Collection 2.0 and works the early bugs out of the system, even higher revenue can be expected.

While some riders feel service quality hasn’t improved enough to merit a fare increase, state law allows the MBTA to raise fares no more than 7 percent once every two years. Further, riders should be aware that in 2017 the T was the fourth largest transportation network in the United States in unlinked passenger trips, but ranked sixth in total fare revenue. 

However, the fare revenue per unlinked passenger trip increased by 60 percent between 2007 and 2017, which is nearly 20 percentage points more than its closest peer system. While a fare hike is nothing new, riders are right to demand that it correspond with improved service.

Get Our Fix the T Updates!

Related posts:

Study: “Pacheco Law” Has Cost MBTA At Least $450 Million Since 1997

Report presented to legislative leaders and state budget conferees…

Pioneer Institute Public Statement on MBTA Reforms in the Budget

Last night, the legislature put the public interest ahead of…

Pioneer and You – Together We Can Fix the T

/
Pioneer has been attacked in a recent radio (WBZ, WEEI, and elsewhere)…

Final, Binding Arbitration Major Obstacle to MBTA Accountability & Performance

Uniquely unaccountable arbitration at MBTA, if unchanged, will…

What Court Documents Show About Compensation at the MBTA vs. Peer Communities

/
Introduction As the Baker Administration works with the state…

MBTA Experiencing Severe Delays in Transparency

/
This winter the MBTA proved that it is capable of publishing…

Way off track

/
A couple of weeks ago, Ari Ofsevit wrote a pretty scathing blog…

The Single Biggest Obstacle to Reform at the MBTA

/
post by Gregory W. Sullivan & Matthew Blackbourn In…

A Step Closer to the First-Class Transit System Massachusetts Deserves

/
This week, a Finance Control Board for the MBTA won the support…

There Is Little Appeal to the Current Use of Binding Arbitration at the T

/
Eliminating final and binding arbitration at the MBTA is key…

The High Cost of Records Requests at the MBTA Hits a New Low

/
As we've written about before, in Massachusetts your legal right…

Testimony: Why Pioneer Supports MBTA Reform

/
Pioneer Research Director Greg Sullivan and Senior Fellow Charles…

The Convention Center Expansion was a House of Cards

/
In a piece by Jack Encarnacao in the Boston Herald, Richard…

Is Keolis Up to the Task?

/
The snow has melted from our streets, our fields are filled with…

Public Left in Dark on Carmen’s Union Contract

/
Background Over the past two months, Pioneer Institute has…

And What About the T’s Retirement Costs?

/
Pension and other post-employment benefit (OPEB) costs significantly…

Harris Foulkes is a Roger Perry Transparency Intern at Pioneer Institute and a rising sophomore at Amherst College studying Economics.