Public Statement: SJC Decision on Prop 80

June 18, 2018/in Economic Opportunity, Featured, News, PioneerLegal /by Editorial Staff

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on

LinkedIn

+

Pioneer Institute and its public-interest law initiative, PioneerLegal, applaud the decision of Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court (SJC) in Christopher Anderson et al. v. Maura Healey.

The SJC upheld decades of precedent in finding that Proposition 80, a ballot initiative that would have instituted a graduated income tax in Massachusetts, violates the “relatedness” provisions of state constitution, thereby precluding voters from expressing a unified statement on public policy.

The Institute, through PioneerLegal, filed an amicus brief with the SJC in support of the plaintiffs before the Court heard oral arguments in February. The Tax Foundation also signed onto the brief.

Pioneer research looked into key legal issues and the negative economic impact that would have resulted from adoption of the ballot measure. The Institute also shared facts with community and business leaders, elected officials, the media and the general public through social and traditional media channels.

Pioneer studies demonstrated that a proposed millionaires tax in Massachusetts would:

Accelerate the out-migration of businesses and high earners;
Ensnare an ever-increasing share of the population over time because it includes an inadequate inflation adjustment index;
Double the effective tax rate for high earners and exacerbate the measure’s economic damage because of the limit on deductions for state and local taxes included in the recent federal tax law;
Generate less than the projected $1.9 billion in annual revenue and increase the Commonwealth’s top capital gains tax rate from 25^th highest in the country to second;
Leave Massachusetts with the sixth highest capital gains rate in the world; and
Lead to a “Connecticut effect,” that is, slower growth, an employer exodus and declining tax revenue;
Finally, the Pioneer released a report thoroughly debunking the methodology of Stanford Associate Professor of Sociology Cristobal Young, whose research served as a singular point of reference for ballot proponents and media outlets that claimed “millionaires” don’t move out of high-tax states.

Alleviating these negative impacts would have taken a minimum of three years, since the measure would have amended the state constitution rather than just change state law. Massachusetts residents, employees and businesses are all beneficiaries of the SJC’s wise decision.

Stay Connected!

Related Posts

The Future of Drone Surveillance

/

July 26, 2019

The Future of Drone Surveillance At some point or another…

How Do Massachusetts’s State Pensions Compare with Their Peers?

/

July 22, 2019

For those who have kept up with Pioneer’s work on pensions,…

The Chancellor at this University Makes about 18.5 Times what an Average Employee at this Same University Makes…

/

July 15, 2019

According to MassOpenBooks, the average annual pay for UMass…

Did Justice Prevail? Questions Surrounding Correctional Officers and Budgetary Allocation within the Suffolk County Sheriff Department and Others

/

July 15, 2019

According to MassOpenBooks 2018 statistics, the Suffolk County…

MassOpenBooks: A Look at the Top Departments by Average Overtime Pay in 2018

/

July 8, 2019

In 2018, the Commonwealth provided a total of $368.15 million…

MassPensions: Highest Reductions in Unfunded Liabilities

/

July 1, 2019

Despite the overall dismal performance of Massachusetts’s public…

Report: Rare Disease Patients Hurt by “One-Size-Fits-All” ICER Framework

/

June 26, 2019

This op-ed appeared in ICERWatch on June 26, 2019. The Institute…

MassPensions: The Leaders and Laggards among Massachusetts Public Pension Systems

/

June 18, 2019

As detailed in a recent study published by the Pioneer Institute,…

The Mass. Pike is in for some massive disruption. Are we ready?

/

May 31, 2019

The Boston Globe By Mary Connaughton and Jim Aloisi May…

Nationally Syndicated Columnist George Will Covers Pioneer’s SCOTUS Amicus Brief Topic on School Choice

/

May 23, 2019

For many years, Pioneer Institute has been a leader in the effort…

Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

May 16, 2019

Pioneer Institute applauds a new rule announced by the U.S. Centers…

A Rational Voice on the State of American Higher Education and the Cost Crisis

/

May 9, 2019

At a time of increasing disruption in the higher education marketplace,…

The Connection Between Property Taxes and Pension Funding

/

May 1, 2019

A recent study from economist Evgenia Gorina, published in the…

Pioneer Institute Files Amicus Brief Urging Supreme Court to Hear School Choice Case

April 29, 2019

Claims amendment to Montana Constitution motivated by anti-Catholic…

New Study Urges State to Slow Down, Rethink Proposal to Protect Students from College Closings

April 16, 2019

Board of Higher Education proposal risks “false positives”…

Time to Say “Cut” on Massachusetts’ Film Tax Credit?

/

April 12, 2019

State Senate President Karen Spilka is taking preliminary steps…

U.S. HHS Secretary Alex Azar to Be Featured Speaker at Pioneer Institute’s 2019 Hewitt Healthcare Lecture

April 8, 2019

BOSTON – Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human…

MassOpenBooks: A look inside MassPort

/

April 2, 2019

Every day, thousands of passengers pass through Logan Airport,…