Public Statement on Nonrenewal of Keolis Commuter Rail Contract

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Pioneer Institute welcomes the news that the MBTA will not renew its contract with problem-plagued commuter rail operator Keolis Commuter Services when the term ends in 2022. If the MBTA can put an effective bidding process into place for the next contract, this is a positive development for the hundred thousand-plus riders who depend on the system every day.

Since 2013, Pioneer Institute has published a steady stream of research, op-eds, blog commentary, and media appearances critical of Keolis’ performance, and calling for greater penalties for lack of performance and even re-opening the current contract. Increasingly frequent cancellations have incurred a reported $14 million in fines over the past two years, many of which have been forgiven by the MBTA, and the system has been hampered by insufficient staffing, defective equipment, and train shortages. While Pioneer, too, is impatient to see Keolis’ service improve, the Institute also opposed the MBTA’s decision to waive fines and pay the vendor an additional $66 million, on top of its $2.68 billion contract.

We are guided by a basic premise: when procuring a public service through a private contractor, the terms of the contract must be enforced – or the public suffers.

Two years ago, Pioneer Institute proposed a comprehensive fix for the MBTA, which included the establishment of a control board, and other powers. In that document, and before, Pioneer is on the record repeatedly (1) questioning the procurement process which ultimately led to only two commuter rail bidders and (2) calling for the penalty provisions of the contract to be consistently enforced.

We applaud this decision and look forward to pressing for the kind of open procurements that will attract more high-quality bidders, as well as providing insights on the type of contract that might actively promote higher quality service and the modernization of commuter rail systems, vehicles, and infrastructure.

Get Our Fix the T Updates!

No Fare! MBTA Tight on Public Records

/
The MBTA has been attracting a lot of attention lately on how…

Thoughts on the Amtrak/MBTA Signal Debacle at Attleboro Station Last April

/
A 13 year-old boy damaged an Amtrak signal system along the Providence/Stoughton…

Study: “Pacheco Law” Has Cost MBTA At Least $450 Million Since 1997

Report presented to legislative leaders and state budget conferees…

Pioneer Institute Public Statement on MBTA Reforms in the Budget

Last night, the legislature put the public interest ahead of…

Pioneer and You – Together We Can Fix the T

/
Pioneer has been attacked in a recent radio (WBZ, WEEI, and elsewhere)…

Final, Binding Arbitration Major Obstacle to MBTA Accountability & Performance

Uniquely unaccountable arbitration at MBTA, if unchanged, will…

What Court Documents Show About Compensation at the MBTA vs. Peer Communities

/
Introduction As the Baker Administration works with the state…

MBTA Experiencing Severe Delays in Transparency

/
This winter the MBTA proved that it is capable of publishing…

Way off track

/
A couple of weeks ago, Ari Ofsevit wrote a pretty scathing blog…

The Single Biggest Obstacle to Reform at the MBTA

/
post by Gregory W. Sullivan & Matthew Blackbourn In…

A Step Closer to the First-Class Transit System Massachusetts Deserves

/
This week, a Finance Control Board for the MBTA won the support…

There Is Little Appeal to the Current Use of Binding Arbitration at the T

/
Eliminating final and binding arbitration at the MBTA is key…

The High Cost of Records Requests at the MBTA Hits a New Low

/
As we've written about before, in Massachusetts your legal right…

Testimony: Why Pioneer Supports MBTA Reform

/
Pioneer Research Director Greg Sullivan and Senior Fellow Charles…

The Convention Center Expansion was a House of Cards

/
In a piece by Jack Encarnacao in the Boston Herald, Richard…

Is Keolis Up to the Task?

/
The snow has melted from our streets, our fields are filled with…