Public Statement on Implementation of the Charitable Giving Deduction

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Despite being awash in cash, the state Legislature just overrode Gov. Charlie Baker’s veto of a provision to delay by yet another year a tax deduction for charitable donations. Rep. Mark Cusack, House chair of the Joint Committee on Revenue, said “it doesn’t mean no, just not now.” If not now, when?

In 2000, Massachusetts voters approved by a 72-28 margin a charitable contribution tax deduction, which would allow taxpayers to recoup an additional five cents on the dollar in state taxes for a charitable gift, up to a maximum of $300. The deduction was suspended amid a budget crunch, and the legislature agreed that it would take effect when the state personal income tax was at 5 percent.

The income tax rate fell to 5 percent in January 2020. However, due to uncertainty about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state’s budget, Gov. Baker delayed the deduction’s implementation until 2022.

Last month, the governor vetoed a provision that would have delayed implementation of the charitable giving deduction yet again. According to Baker, “the combination of strong state revenues and serious needs facing non-profits and charitable organizations necessitates this tax deduction’s going into place.”

Why not incentivize those taxpayers who donate to contribute to their communities? The Massachusetts Nonprofit Network has estimated that a majority of charitable donations are from individuals with lower or middle-income backgrounds; so the charitable tax deduction would put money back into Massachusetts’ citizens pockets, no matter their socioeconomic status.

In 2019, it was estimated that the deduction could cost Massachusetts about $64 million in FY 2021, and about $300 million in full fiscal years after that. This sounds like a hefty number, but it must be put in a proper context.  If collections continue on the projected path, Massachusetts will collect about $31 billion in tax revenue in FY 2021. This surpasses forecast collections, which could lead to a substantial surplus at the end of FY 2021.

The people have spoken — 21 years ago. It’s time to let the voices of the many be heard.

Get Updates on Our Economic Opportunity Research

Related Content:

State Contractor Confirms: GLX Cost Overruns Due to Bid Process

/
As Pioneer first pointed out in a September blog post and again…

Why Mental Health, Why Now?

/
When the topic of “Improving Mental Health” was chosen, the importance resonated immediately. It may be more relevant than at any other point in our nation’s history. Every area of core government function is affected by the status of mental health. Our failure to find answers and reduce inefficiencies costs the Commonwealth innocent lives and millions of dollars each year.

A Step Forward on Meaningful Public Records Reform?

/
Yesterday’s Boston Globe editorial has it right - the time…

MBTA Scorecards: A Work in (Backwards) Progress?

/
Three weeks ago the MBTA announced the long-awaited return of…

September’s Come and Gone – and Where’s Public Records Reform?

/
How fitting is it that a bill meant to strengthen our anemic…

How To Tell If The Price Is Right: Fostering Transparency in Healthcare Prices for Massachusetts Consumers

/
Notwithstanding a Massachusetts law requiring the clear, prompt…

New MBTA Performance Reports: Work In Progress

/
This week, the MBTA began publishing new weekly performance reports…

T Has Failed to Hold Keolis to Commuter Rail Operating Contract

/
Over two-dozen rail operators initially expressed interest in…

How to Save the MBTA Over $100 Million a Year

/
The first step in reforming the MBTA has been taken by the Legislature…

There’s No Excuse for a ‘No-Excuses’ Contract With Excuses

/
Despite a “no-excuses” contract with Keolis Commuter Services…