Study Applauds State Decision To Let Healthcare Spending Benchmark Decrease

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on

Calls on policy makers to continue pursuing efforts to trim healthcare spending

BOSTON – A new Pioneer Institute Policy Brief applauds the decision by the Commonwealth’s Health Policy Commission to allow the benchmark for increases in the overall rate of healthcare spending to decrease this year, but urges state policy makers to remain focused on the larger culture changes that will be needed to rein in healthcare costs.

“It’s important to keep our cost control expectations high,” said Pioneer Senior Fellow in Healthcare Barbara Anthony, who coauthored “Lowering the Healthcare Cost Growth Benchmark” with Scott Haller.  “But we must stay focused on the larger factors that drive healthcare costs.”

Haller and Anthony urge the commonwealth to carefully study the performance of providers and payers in terms of their adoption of payment reform measures, such as of alternative payment methodologies (APMs), and to continue to pursue other approaches to reducing costs such as providing consumers with incentives to use lower-cost, high-quality providers. “The impetus behind Ch. 224 was that payment reform would bring about efficiencies and cost savings. It’s time to ask providers and payers: Where’s the beef?” Anthony added.

Traditional fee-for-service payment arrangements offer incentives for providers to increase profits by conducting more tests and other medical procedures.

Chapter 224 of the Acts of 2012 was designed to control healthcare costs by encouraging the adoption of payment reform measures under which providers assume some or all of the financial risk associated with providing health care services and are rewarded for quality outcomes.  Since the provider assumes financial risk, there is an incentive to hold costs down while striving for good patient results.  Transparency provisions that make it easier for consumers to access cost and quality information were designed to ensure that quality is maintained.

Through last year, the spending benchmark included in Chapter 224 was pegged to the projected annual growth in gross state product (GSP), which has been forecast at 3.6 percent since 2013.  At 2.4 percent, growth in consumer healthcare spending was below benchmark in 2013, but it rose to 4.2 percent and 4.1 percent respectively in 2014 and 2015.

This year the benchmark was slated to drop to half a percentage point below projected GSP growth.  The Health Policy Commission could have delayed the decrease, but it chose not to do so.

About the Authors:

Barbara Anthony, a lawyer, is a senior fellow in healthcare at Pioneer Institute focusing on healthcare price and quality transparency.  She is also an associate at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Center for Business and Government.  She served as Massachusetts Undersecretary for Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation from 2009 to 2015.

Scott Haller graduated from Northeastern University with a Bachelor’s Degree in Political Science. He started working at Pioneer Institute through the Northeastern’s Co-op Program and continues now as the Lovett C. Peters Fellow in Healthcare. He previously worked at the Office of the Inspector General.

Pioneer Institute is an independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization that seeks to improve the quality of life in Massachusetts through civic discourse and intellectually rigorous, data-driven public policy solutions based on free market principles, individual liberty and responsibility, and the ideal of effective, limited and accountable government.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Cost Transparency Initiative!

Study: Shift from Highest-Priced Healthcare Providers Would Generate Tremendous Savings

Consumers in just one Massachusetts county could have saved nearly $22 million in a single year and $116.6 million adjusted for inflation over four years if they switched from using the most expensive providers for 16 shoppable healthcare services to those whose prices were closer to average, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

HHS COVID Funding Tracker

As of July, the Feds have distributed $86.7 billion to medical providers, of which $2.3 billion came to Massachusetts. Pioneer’s new HHS COVID-19 Funding app shows who and how much, from the $1 sent to American Current Care of Massachusetts, to the $418,034,675 sent to the MA Department of Public Health. We also break down the distribution by city or town.

Pioneer Urges Future COVID-19 Study and Recommendations Task Force to Consider Impact on Nursing Home Residents

After over 5,000 people have died of COVID-19 in Massachusetts nursing homes, Pioneer Institute is issuing an open letter to the state’s future COVID-19 health equity task force that outlines an extensive list of recommendations on infection control and preparedness in eldercare facilities.

Open Letter: COVID-19 Study and Recommendations Task Force Established Pursuant to Massachusetts Bill H.4672

Pioneer hopes the members of this important task force will be appointed as soon as possible and that they will look into recommendations to address Covid-19 among the aged and in the state’s nursing homes. Read our Open Letter.

National Study Finds Most States Lack Healthcare Price Transparency Laws

At a time when the coronavirus pandemic has caused massive shifts in state policies on telehealth and scope of practice in healthcare, a new Pioneer Institute study underscores that most of the 50 states continue to suffer from weak laws regarding price transparency.  The study identified states that have laws that require carriers, providers or both to provide personalized cost information to consumers before obtaining healthcare services.  Fully 33 states placed in the lowest of the three broad analytic tiers on the strength of their state healthcare transparency laws. 

New Study Calls for Re-thinking Massachusetts’ COVID-19 Care Standards

Pioneer's new study raises concerns about the Massachusetts Department of Public Health’s (DPH’s) Crises Standards of Care (CSC) issued earlier this month, which bear the earmarks of a state bureaucratic effort and should be rethought under a process that includes a thorough vetting by Massachusetts citizens.

Pioneer Poll: MA Healthcare Consumers Overwhelmingly Want Price Information on Services, but Few Know How to Get It

A new Pioneer poll shows seven out of ten Massachusetts workers who get their health insurance through their employers want to know the price of a healthcare procedure before they obtain it, but most of them do not how to obtain such information, even though information is already available through their insurers’ cost estimator tools.

Pioneer Institute to Present Results of New Consumer Poll Monday at State House Healthcare Price Transparency Event

BOSTON – Pioneer Institute will present the results of a new…

Making Healthcare Prices Accessible

Today, Pioneer Institute filed a Public Comment with the federal…

Study Finds Patient Cost for MRI Largely Unrelated to Overall Price or Insurer Contribution at 14 MA Hospitals

Read coverage of this report in WCVB-TV, Boston Herald, the Boston…

A Wealth of Data: A Map of the Massachusetts Opioid Epidemic

In 2016, the rate of opioid overdose deaths in Massachusetts…

Kudos To CHIA On Major Step Toward Greater Healthcare Price Transparency

Pioneer applauds the Center for Health Information and Analysis…

Report Recommends Alternatives to Drug Pricing Transparency Legislation

Value-based reimbursement, focus on middlemen in drug distribution…