Survey: Consumers Want Healthcare Price Information, But Few Realize It’s Available

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on

State law, online tools are examples of the progress, but there’s more to do

BOSTON – Great strides have been made to increase healthcare price transparency through online cost estimator tools and a state law that requires providers to give out price information. Yet despite the eagerness of consumers to access prices and out-of-pocket costs, many are unaware that such information is available and don’t know how to access it, according to survey results published by Pioneer Institute.

“Consumers say they want price information, but only a small portion of people know they have access to it,” said Barbara Anthony, who authored “Healthcare Price Transparency in Massachusetts: Results from a survey of Massachusetts consumers regarding healthcare price transparency,” with Seher Chowdhury. “The gap between aspirations and the ability to actually obtain price information must be filled.”

DAPA Research at Suffolk University surveyed 500 adults in Massachusetts who obtain their insurance through employers or on the open market between June 15th and 23rd of 2019. Most results are at a 96 percent confidence level. Here is a summary of the findings:

Satisfaction with insurers and deductibles

Three quarters of Massachusetts consumers with private commercial insurance said they were satisfied or very satisfied with their coverage. Yet 64 percent of those expressing satisfaction with their coverage still worry about healthcare costs.

Seventy-six percent of respondents either have no deductible of a deductible of $3,000 or less. Eleven percent have deductibles greater than $3,000, and 12 percent don’t know their deductible.

Twenty-three percent said they had chosen not to obtain necessary healthcare in the last three years due to cost. It appears, however, that deductible size may not be the primary reason for deferring care, since 80 percent of those who did so had deductibles of less than $3,000. Deferring necessary care can lead to poorer and more expensive health outcomes.

Finding healthcare prices

Only one in five Massachusetts consumers have tried to find price information before obtaining a healthcare service. It’s not that they aren’t interested; rather, it appears that consumers don’t know they have a right to such information under state law and they don’t know how to access it.

Seven in ten consumers said they would like to know prices, but about the same percentage didn’t know insurance carriers have price estimator tools they could use to find them.

A majority said they had never thought of trying to obtain healthcare price information.

Respondents said the sources they would trust the most for price information were, in order, their insurance company, their doctor, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Incentives to choose less expensive providers

When asked a series of questions about what would help incent them to choose lower-cost providers, nearly seven out of 10 said physician or hospital websites that show out-of-pocket costs. About two thirds cited cash-back rewards form their insurer for choosing less expensive providers. A similar percentage wanted notifications from insurers about less expensive providers for specific services.

Eight of ten respondents were interested in doctor and hospital quality ratings. Three out of four wanted to know the reimbursement amounts insurers paid to doctors and hospitals for specific health services. Two thirds said an iPhone app that shows specific out-of-pocket costs would help.


Anthony and Chowdhury call for all providers to be more innovative in making price information available in consumer-friendly formats. Physician practices and hospital administrators should be trained to help patients navigate cost estimator tools and insurers should more aggressively market the tools while continuing to make them more customer friendly.

They also called on the Commonwealth to use its bully pulpit and assert more leadership in promoting price transparency and educating businesses, consumers, insurers, and providers. Similarly, insurance companies and employers should work together to educate members and employees about the availability of pricing information.

Finally, high satisfaction with current health insurance equates to a great opportunity for carriers to educate and incentivize cost consciousness among their members.

About the Authors

Barbara Anthony, lawyer, economist, and public policy expert, is a Senior Fellow in Healthcare Policy at Pioneer Institute. She was also a former Senior Fellow and Associate at the Harvard Kennedy School’s Center for Business and Government where she researched and wrote about Massachusetts market reform and healthcare cost containment efforts. She served as Massachusetts Undersecretary of the Office of Consumer Affairs and Business Regulation from 2009 to 2015 and has worked at the intersection of federal and state commercial regulation and the business community for many years.  Anthony’s work has appeared in numerous state and national publications.

Seher Chowdhury graduated this Spring from the Boston University School of Public Health (BUSPH) with a Masters Degree in Public Health; her areas of specialization include Health Policy & law and Epidemiology and Biostatis­tics. She has been a Pioneer Research Assistant in Healthcare Policy since June 2019. She has worked extensively in the area of healthcare price transparency along with Pioneer’s Senior Fellows. She participated extensively in Pioneer’s first state poll and analysis of consumers’ attitudes toward healthcare price transparency. Outside of price transparency, her areas of interest include Med­icaid reform and expansion; reproductive and minority health access and equity; and the inter­section of health, human rights, and bioethics. Seher graduated from the University of California at Los Angeles (UCLA) in 2018 with a Bachelor of Science degree, where she completed a major in Biology and minor in Asian Languages (Korean concentration).

About Pioneer


Pioneer Institute develops and communicates dynamic ideas that advance prosperity and a vibrant civic life in Massachusetts and beyond.


Success for Pioneer is when the citizens of our state and nation prosper and our society thrives because we enjoy world-class options in education, healthcare, transportation and economic opportunity, and when our government is limited, accountable and transparent.


Pioneer believes that America is at its best when our citizenry is well-educated, committed to liberty, personal responsibility, and free enterprise, and both willing and able to test their beliefs based on facts and the free exchange of ideas.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Cost Transparency Initiative!

Related Posts:

Pioneer Institute Statement on the Commonwealth’s Discontinuance of the COVID-19 Weekly Public Health Report

Useful information about COVID cases or deaths at individual homes has become less available at a time when cases are increasing again, even among vaccinated residents. Pioneer urges Massachusetts to immediately reinstate the so-called Weekly Report, which contains cases and deaths inside individual nursing homes.

Study: Massachusetts Should Retain Additional Healthcare System Flexibility Granted During Pandemic

Massachusetts’ emergency declaration for COVID-19 ends on June 15, and with it some enhanced flexibility that has been allowed in the healthcare system.  Some of the added flexibility highlighted barriers that make the system more expensive, harder to access and less patient-centered, and the Commonwealth should consider permanently removing these barriers, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Study Calls for Better Reporting on Impact of COVID-19 in Eldercare Facilities

Over time, the Massachusetts Executive Office of Health and Human Services and Department of Public Health (DPH) have improved reporting about cases and deaths from COVID-19 in state-regulated eldercare facilities, but flaws and omissions remain and should be corrected, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

New Analysis: ICER Framework Ignores Patient Preferences, Innovation & Societal Benefits in Evaluating Cost-Effectiveness of New Cancer Treatments

Pioneer Institute today released a new analysis, The QALY and Cancer Treatments: An Ill-Advised Match, that examines the alarming methodological and contextual shortcomings of the Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALY)-based methodology in evaluating new cancer therapies. The Pioneer Institute analysis reveals five specific problems with ICER’s evaluation of cancer treatments and demonstrates the urgent need to prohibit the use of the QALY amid trends in rapid cancer innovations and personalized medicine.

Study: Massachusetts Should Embrace Direct Healthcare Options

Especially in the COVID era, many are looking to alleviate the increased burden on the healthcare system.  One solution is direct healthcare (DHC), which can provide more patient-centered care at affordable prices and is an effective model to increase access to care for the uninsured, underinsured and those on public programs like Medicaid, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Survey: Consumers Want Healthcare Price Information, But Few Realize It’s Available

Great strides have been made to increase healthcare price transparency through online cost estimator tools and a state law that requires providers to give out price information. Yet despite the eagerness of consumers to access prices and out-of-pocket costs, many are unaware that such information is available and don’t know how to access it, according to survey results published by Pioneer Institute.

Study: Growth of Antibiotic-Resistant Infections Could Have Massive Human, Financial Costs

The world was blindsided by COVID-19, but a new Pioneer Institute study finds that even as we continue to wrestle with the pandemic, another threat looms that scientists have long known about but the nation has thus far failed to address: the growth of antibiotic-resistant infections. “Market dysfunction and perverse Medicare reimbursement rates have led to a growth in infections that resist antibiotics,” said Gunnar Esiason, author of “Antimicrobial Resistance: Learning from the current global health crisis to prevent another one.”  If we don’t solve this problem, the human and economic costs are likely to be astronomical.”

Study: Growing Drug Rebates Hurt Both Consumers and Healthcare System

Ever-larger rebates are distorting the market for branded drugs and producing outcomes that often benefit neither consumers nor the healthcare system, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Study: Shift from Highest-Priced Healthcare Providers Would Generate Tremendous Savings

Consumers in just one Massachusetts county could have saved nearly $22 million in a single year and $116.6 million adjusted for inflation over four years if they switched from using the most expensive providers for 16 shoppable healthcare services to those whose prices were closer to average, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Pioneer Urges Future COVID-19 Study and Recommendations Task Force to Consider Impact on Nursing Home Residents

After over 5,000 people have died of COVID-19 in Massachusetts nursing homes, Pioneer Institute is issuing an open letter to the state’s future COVID-19 health equity task force that outlines an extensive list of recommendations on infection control and preparedness in eldercare facilities.

Open Letter: COVID-19 Study and Recommendations Task Force Established Pursuant to Massachusetts Bill H.4672

Pioneer hopes the members of this important task force will be appointed as soon as possible and that they will look into recommendations to address Covid-19 among the aged and in the state’s nursing homes. Read our Open Letter.

Combatting COVID-19: Life in the MGH Emergency Room

Join host Joe Selvaggi and Pioneer Senior Fellow Josh Archambault as they talk with Dr. David King about the experience of being in emergent care during a pandemic and lockdown. They explore the challenges of coping with a poorly understood virus during a lockdown, all while continuing to serve the sick.