Study: After-School Programs Can Help Improve Flat or Declining Math Achievement

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Philanthropic, other organizations should consider providing financial assistance to allow programs to expand into lower-income communities

BOSTON – At a time of declining state and national math proficiency, after-school math programs offer a viable option for quickly increasing the number of mathematically competent students, according to a new Pioneer Institute study that profiles two such programs: Kumon and the Russian School of Mathematics (RSM).

“Given the disappointing state of math education in American public schools, after-school math programs could play a particularly important role,” said Ze’ev Wurman, co-author with William Donovan, of “Axioms of Excellence: Kumon and the Russian School of Mathematics.”

For the first time since 1990, fourth- and eighth-grade math scores fell on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress. They remained flat in 2017.

After rising for several years, math scores on the ACT college entrance exam have been falling since 2012. In 2018, the average math score dipped below the 1998 level. What improvement has been achieved on various tests has largely been limited to the children of highly educated parents.

Progress has also slowed in Massachusetts, where the percentage of students scoring “Below Basic” on state testing rose from 15 percent in 2015 to 19 percent in 2017.

These poor outcomes have facilitated the growth of private after-school math programs like Kumon and the Russian School of Mathematics.  Japan-based Kumon celebrated its 60th anniversary in 2018.  It currently serves 4.2 million students at nearly 25,000 learning centers in 50 countries and regions.  The company has 45 Massachusetts locations, 19 of which are within route 128.

Kumon students start as early as age three and can continue until they complete the program, which means mastering high school-level math, including differential equations.  Students master a series of sequential worksheets, each one slightly more challenging than its predecessor.

Independent learning and building self-confidence are priorities.  After completing a placement test, each student begins at a level at which she or he would have little difficulty.  They proceed through the worksheets at their own pace, going to the Kumon Center twice a week and completing other work at home.

Like Kumon, Newton-based RSM, which serves 25,000 students in 40 locations across 11 states and Canada, including 15 mostly affluent Massachusetts municipalities, believes in starting students young.  RSM students attend weekly classroom sessions that range between 90 minutes and 2.5 hours, depending on the student’s grade level.

Otherwise the two programs take very different approaches.  While Kumon is focused on routinizing important math abilities like multiplication tables to free up working memory for more complex functions, RSM stresses abstraction and reasoning skills.

Wurman and Donovan recommend that philanthropic and other organizations consider providing financial assistance to allow after-school math programs to expand into low-income communities where they are sorely needed.

The authors also call for more active communication between teachers and after-school programs, so after-school instructors know what students worked on that day and what they will need to know to master the next lesson.

About the Authors

William Donovan is a former staff writer with The Providence Journal in Rhode Island where he wrote about business and government. He has taught business journalism in the graduate programs at Boston University and Northeastern University. He received his undergraduate degree from Boston College and his master’s degree in journalism from American University in Washington, D.C.

Ze’ev Wurman is a senior fellow with the American Principles Project. He participated in developing California’s education standards and the state assessments in mathematics between 1995 and 2007. Between 2007 and 2009 he served as a senior policy adviser with the Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development at the U.S. Department of Education. In 2010, Wurman served on the California Academic Content Standards Commission that evaluated the suitability of the Common Core standards for California and was one of its two members who voted against their adoption. He is an executive in a semiconductor start-up company in the Silicon Valley and holds over 35 U.S. patents.

About Pioneer

Pioneer Institute is an independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization that seeks to improve the quality of life in Massachusetts through civic discourse and intellectually rigorous, data-driven public policy solutions based on free market principles, individual liberty and responsibility, and the ideal of effective, limited and accountable government.

Get Our Common Core Updates

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Related Posts:

Big dates with the feds

/
Here they are! - March 4th United States Secretary of Education…

Why soft skills are pernicious

/
Way back in February 2009, we criticized a report issued by the…

On Finn and Linn

/
Checker Finn has a great blog at the Flypaper, which notes the…

Arne Duncan goes DC

/
There was/is the big push to centralize health care. Now centralize…

Charters and disadvantaged students

/
We've had some long discussions with legislators and the media…

Good news on charter performance

/
From Marc Kenen of the Mass Charter School Association comes…

How is this for pushing hard to obtain Race to the Top Funds?

/
In a recent post, I pointed to the new Commissioner of Education…

Will the Gloucester mess impact the charter cap lift?

/
Whether House Education Committee Chair Marty Walz was deflecting…

Charter Watch, August 11

/
Thus begins our series of posts on how people are moving the…

Will MA forfeit education stimulus dollars?

/
EdNews.org passes on this AP report on US Ed Secretary Arne Duncan's…

The Know-Nothing Amendments: Barriers to School Choice in Massachusetts

/
Barriers to School Choice in Massachusetts Author(s): Cornelius…

Is KIPP really scalable?

/
Yesterday on Slate, in her review of Jay Mathews' new book on…

Patrick comes out for school choice!

/
Your Excellency, We at Pioneer were feeling as double-crossed…

School choice programs increase 84 percent in 5 years

/
No, not here, silly. In the rest of the United States! Do I have…

WaPo on Michelle Rhee and quality teachers

/
The keynote for this year's Better Government Competition, which…

Michelle Rhee takes out the knife

/
From the Washingtonian.com piece on Michelle Rhee, the chancellor…

NYC charter to pay teachers more than lawyers

/
But the unions don't like this idea. A proposed New York City…