Op-ed: Justification For 40% Legislative Leadership Raises Is Political Voodoo

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

When doing the people’s will is secondary to legislators’ self-interest, how strong is our democracy? The state Legislature is on the verge of overriding the Governor’s veto of legislation that includes sizable pay raises for state and legislative leaders. Their actions on this front will answer the democracy question.

Since legislators can’t raise their base pay, the hikes are limited to leadership positions in the form of increased legislative stipends. Base pay increases are formulaic and tied to the state’s median household income.

The Boston Globe reported on several questionable aspects of the bill. It contains an “emergency preamble,” which means the raises would take effect immediately. The legislation also includes pay hikes for the judiciary, which, due to a clause in the state Constitution, makes it challenging at best to reverse via initiative petition. And because committee chairs and other leadership positions have not yet been officially selected, legislators don’t need to worry about violating conflict of interest laws for voting on their own financial interests.

In short, this was done swiftly and slickly, without public input and leaving members of the public with little recourse. Read more on WGBH News

Get Connected!


Pioneer in the News: 

The Boston Globe: 16 Mass. state workers made $100,000 or more in overtime pay last year 

The Boston Globe: Mass. reduced state payroll for the first time in years

Boston Herald: Anthony and Haller: State insurer using market clout to curb health costs

The Boston Globe: PRIM and proper? Statehouse leader’s law firm profited from ties to public retirement funds


Related Blog Posts:

MBTA Management Discussions: Where Did They Go?

/
The government works for the people. As with any employee, the…

Thoughts on Transparency: Full Disclosure of Gasoline Taxes

/
One of Pioneer Institute’s ongoing goals is to promote government…

MBTA Performance Transparency: A Whole New Meaning to Deferred Maintenance

/
Governments need to adapt to the evolving needs of constituents,…

Our Government Transparency Resolutions for 2016

/
While it's possible that 2016 will see an historic surge…

Two States, Two Bills, Two Different Takes on Transparency

/
This week, Florida State Representative Greg Steube and Senator…

Document Request Reveals Which Commuter Rail Trains Are Frequently Delayed

/
There is a unique relationship between the MBTA and its riders…

Massachusetts Needs Its Own CBO

/
State Senator Jamie Eldridge is on to something.  The State…

A Step Forward on Meaningful Public Records Reform?

/
Yesterday’s Boston Globe editorial has it right - the time…

MBTA Scorecards: A Work in (Backwards) Progress?

/
Three weeks ago the MBTA announced the long-awaited return of…

September’s Come and Gone – and Where’s Public Records Reform?

/
How fitting is it that a bill meant to strengthen our anemic…

How To Tell If The Price Is Right: Fostering Transparency in Healthcare Prices for Massachusetts Consumers

/
Notwithstanding a Massachusetts law requiring the clear, prompt…

New MBTA Performance Reports: Work In Progress

/
This week, the MBTA began publishing new weekly performance reports…

There’s No Excuse for a ‘No-Excuses’ Contract With Excuses

/
Despite a “no-excuses” contract with Keolis Commuter Services…

The Clock is Ticking on Massachusetts Public Record Reform

/
From the Green Line extension's woes, to the narrowly dodged…

Boston: The Jaywalking Capital of America?

/
If you see someone waiting for a walk signal at a Boston intersection,…

Transparency Needed for Massachusetts Rest Homes

/
Extended care facilities provide either temporary or permanent…