Op-ed: Justification For 40% Legislative Leadership Raises Is Political Voodoo

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

When doing the people’s will is secondary to legislators’ self-interest, how strong is our democracy? The state Legislature is on the verge of overriding the Governor’s veto of legislation that includes sizable pay raises for state and legislative leaders. Their actions on this front will answer the democracy question.

Since legislators can’t raise their base pay, the hikes are limited to leadership positions in the form of increased legislative stipends. Base pay increases are formulaic and tied to the state’s median household income.

The Boston Globe reported on several questionable aspects of the bill. It contains an “emergency preamble,” which means the raises would take effect immediately. The legislation also includes pay hikes for the judiciary, which, due to a clause in the state Constitution, makes it challenging at best to reverse via initiative petition. And because committee chairs and other leadership positions have not yet been officially selected, legislators don’t need to worry about violating conflict of interest laws for voting on their own financial interests.

In short, this was done swiftly and slickly, without public input and leaving members of the public with little recourse. Read more on WGBH News

Get Connected!


Pioneer in the News: 

The Boston Globe: 16 Mass. state workers made $100,000 or more in overtime pay last year 

The Boston Globe: Mass. reduced state payroll for the first time in years

Boston Herald: Anthony and Haller: State insurer using market clout to curb health costs

The Boston Globe: PRIM and proper? Statehouse leader’s law firm profited from ties to public retirement funds


Related Blog Posts:

Getting Tough on Keolis?

/
You rush to feed your kids breakfast; leave your house so fast…

Baker Public Records Announcement a Great Start – So Long as it’s a Start

/
These last few weeks have been hectic for transparency advocates…

Problems with Potholes in Boston

/
Boston has a pothole problem. Or, more accurately, Boston has…

The Control Board Needs to Insist on Transparency with Keolis

/
On July 21, the special panel created to address failures at…

MBTA gets an F for Public Records Law Compliance

/
Ten days. That is how long it is supposed to take for a Massachusetts…

Why Are Tuition and Fees Rising at UMass?

/
Over the last half-century, college tuition costs have exploded…

Our Letter to the Open Meeting Advisory Commission

/
Public trust and citizen engagement is fundamental in a healthy…

For Massachusetts Public Records law, a Little Progress Goes a Long Way

/
Earlier this month, Massachusetts transparency advocates celebrated…

An Open Request to the State Ethics Commission

/
When the State Ethics Commission was created in 1978 under Section…

Making Financial Disclosures “Available for Public Inspection”

/
Chapter 268B, Section 3(d) of Massachusetts General Laws provides…

No Fare! MBTA Tight on Public Records

/
The MBTA has been attracting a lot of attention lately on how…

A Pretty Much Guaranteed Free Ride

/
There's no such thing as a free ride. Ask any accountant and…

Massachusetts Financial Disclosures – Weak and Out of Reach

/
In the last five years, 250 public servants in Massachusetts…

What Court Documents Show About Compensation at the MBTA vs. Peer Communities

/
Introduction As the Baker Administration works with the state…

MassDOT Relocation Proposal Gives Way to More Pressing Issues

/
The Baker administration has recently abandoned a proposal to…

A Tale of Two Transparencies

/
Recently, we wrote about the redemption of Secretary of State…

The Convention Center Authority’s Inflated Claims

/
In the wake of our recent brief, Analyzing the Convention Center…

MBTA Experiencing Severe Delays in Transparency

/
This winter the MBTA proved that it is capable of publishing…