Public Statement on Implementation of the Charitable Giving Deduction

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Despite being awash in cash, the state Legislature just overrode Gov. Charlie Baker’s veto of a provision to delay by yet another year a tax deduction for charitable donations. Rep. Mark Cusack, House chair of the Joint Committee on Revenue, said “it doesn’t mean no, just not now.” If not now, when?

In 2000, Massachusetts voters approved by a 72-28 margin a charitable contribution tax deduction, which would allow taxpayers to recoup an additional five cents on the dollar in state taxes for a charitable gift, up to a maximum of $300. The deduction was suspended amid a budget crunch, and the legislature agreed that it would take effect when the state personal income tax was at 5 percent.

The income tax rate fell to 5 percent in January 2020. However, due to uncertainty about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state’s budget, Gov. Baker delayed the deduction’s implementation until 2022.

Last month, the governor vetoed a provision that would have delayed implementation of the charitable giving deduction yet again. According to Baker, “the combination of strong state revenues and serious needs facing non-profits and charitable organizations necessitates this tax deduction’s going into place.”

Why not incentivize those taxpayers who donate to contribute to their communities? The Massachusetts Nonprofit Network has estimated that a majority of charitable donations are from individuals with lower or middle-income backgrounds; so the charitable tax deduction would put money back into Massachusetts’ citizens pockets, no matter their socioeconomic status.

In 2019, it was estimated that the deduction could cost Massachusetts about $64 million in FY 2021, and about $300 million in full fiscal years after that. This sounds like a hefty number, but it must be put in a proper context.  If collections continue on the projected path, Massachusetts will collect about $31 billion in tax revenue in FY 2021. This surpasses forecast collections, which could lead to a substantial surplus at the end of FY 2021.

The people have spoken — 21 years ago. It’s time to let the voices of the many be heard.

Get Updates on Our Economic Opportunity Research

Related Content:

The Boston Globe: State’s focus is too narrow for job creation

/
We need a new approach to put the hundreds of thousands of unemployed Massachusetts citizens back to work. We need to stop picking winners and losers, and stop making such concentrated, publicly funded bets on specific companies and industries.

GLOBE OP-ED: Mass. cities need new deal with public employees

/
The Mayor of New Bedford-- one of Pioneer's Middle Cities--…

Keeping Massachusetts Competitive: The Business Climate in Context

/
The Business Climate in Context Author(s): Steve Poftak — Publication…

Revenue sharing for cities is a non-starter

/
In today's Boston Herald Jay Fitzgerald penned a tough article…

The Return of the Nanny State

/
Or maybe its no sign-maker left behind. The latest 'nanny-state'…

Mr. Speaker, Why Stop With The CJAM?

/
UPDATE: Eagle-eyed reader notes that the amendment was filed…

Why Did the Old Woman Swallow the Fly?

/
So, in order to make the convention center (which taxpayers subsidized…

Questioning the AGs Means, Not Motive

/
This morning's Globe has a story on the Attorney General's office…

Still Curious About State Workforce Numbers

/
Brian Mooney penned a piece for the Globe last week discussing…