Public Statement on Implementation of the Charitable Giving Deduction

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Despite being awash in cash, the state Legislature just overrode Gov. Charlie Baker’s veto of a provision to delay by yet another year a tax deduction for charitable donations. Rep. Mark Cusack, House chair of the Joint Committee on Revenue, said “it doesn’t mean no, just not now.” If not now, when?

In 2000, Massachusetts voters approved by a 72-28 margin a charitable contribution tax deduction, which would allow taxpayers to recoup an additional five cents on the dollar in state taxes for a charitable gift, up to a maximum of $300. The deduction was suspended amid a budget crunch, and the legislature agreed that it would take effect when the state personal income tax was at 5 percent.

The income tax rate fell to 5 percent in January 2020. However, due to uncertainty about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state’s budget, Gov. Baker delayed the deduction’s implementation until 2022.

Last month, the governor vetoed a provision that would have delayed implementation of the charitable giving deduction yet again. According to Baker, “the combination of strong state revenues and serious needs facing non-profits and charitable organizations necessitates this tax deduction’s going into place.”

Why not incentivize those taxpayers who donate to contribute to their communities? The Massachusetts Nonprofit Network has estimated that a majority of charitable donations are from individuals with lower or middle-income backgrounds; so the charitable tax deduction would put money back into Massachusetts’ citizens pockets, no matter their socioeconomic status.

In 2019, it was estimated that the deduction could cost Massachusetts about $64 million in FY 2021, and about $300 million in full fiscal years after that. This sounds like a hefty number, but it must be put in a proper context.  If collections continue on the projected path, Massachusetts will collect about $31 billion in tax revenue in FY 2021. This surpasses forecast collections, which could lead to a substantial surplus at the end of FY 2021.

The people have spoken — 21 years ago. It’s time to let the voices of the many be heard.

Get Updates on Our Economic Opportunity Research

Related Content:

Is the Commissioner of Education Complying with the Law?

/
Twenty years after the passage of the landmark Massachusetts…

Who’s Responsible for the MBTA Retirement Fund

/
It cannot have been a particularly merry Christmas for Stephen…

MassDOT’s Cost Savings Dead End

/
In a joint press release praising the Transportation Reform…

Massachusetts Pension Funding Deal Less than Meets the Eye

/
Do pension funding changes display true fiscal responsibility or just election-year window dressing?

Enter the 2014 Better Government Competition – Winning Prize: $10,000 – Theme: Technology

/
Pioneer Institute invites you to enter our 2014 Better Government…

Somerville police want $780 for routine personnel records

/
For the past several months, the Pioneer Institute and MuckRock…

South Coast Rail not the way to go

/
RESIDENTS OF MASSACHUSETTS’ South Coast believe their region…

Public Statement Regarding the MBTA’s Lack of Transparency

The future finances of the MBTA’s employees depend on solid…

Open Letter to the Commissioners of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission

/
Gaming Commission's Enhanced Ethics Code On October 24, 2013,…

Gaming the Gaming Commission’s “Enhanced Code of Ethics”?

/
The Boston Globe published stories on November 21st and December…

Detroit Breakdown

/
The New York Times today is reporting that Detroit is eligible…

Study: GASB Rules Improving, But Still Need Measured Reform

Study Finds Further Reform of GASB Rules Necessary, But Must…