Public Statement on Implementation of the Charitable Giving Deduction

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Despite being awash in cash, the state Legislature just overrode Gov. Charlie Baker’s veto of a provision to delay by yet another year a tax deduction for charitable donations. Rep. Mark Cusack, House chair of the Joint Committee on Revenue, said “it doesn’t mean no, just not now.” If not now, when?

In 2000, Massachusetts voters approved by a 72-28 margin a charitable contribution tax deduction, which would allow taxpayers to recoup an additional five cents on the dollar in state taxes for a charitable gift, up to a maximum of $300. The deduction was suspended amid a budget crunch, and the legislature agreed that it would take effect when the state personal income tax was at 5 percent.

The income tax rate fell to 5 percent in January 2020. However, due to uncertainty about the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the state’s budget, Gov. Baker delayed the deduction’s implementation until 2022.

Last month, the governor vetoed a provision that would have delayed implementation of the charitable giving deduction yet again. According to Baker, “the combination of strong state revenues and serious needs facing non-profits and charitable organizations necessitates this tax deduction’s going into place.”

Why not incentivize those taxpayers who donate to contribute to their communities? The Massachusetts Nonprofit Network has estimated that a majority of charitable donations are from individuals with lower or middle-income backgrounds; so the charitable tax deduction would put money back into Massachusetts’ citizens pockets, no matter their socioeconomic status.

In 2019, it was estimated that the deduction could cost Massachusetts about $64 million in FY 2021, and about $300 million in full fiscal years after that. This sounds like a hefty number, but it must be put in a proper context.  If collections continue on the projected path, Massachusetts will collect about $31 billion in tax revenue in FY 2021. This surpasses forecast collections, which could lead to a substantial surplus at the end of FY 2021.

The people have spoken — 21 years ago. It’s time to let the voices of the many be heard.

Get Updates on Our Economic Opportunity Research

Related Content:

Massachusetts Financial Disclosures – Weak and Out of Reach

/
In the last five years, 250 public servants in Massachusetts…

What Court Documents Show About Compensation at the MBTA vs. Peer Communities

/
Introduction As the Baker Administration works with the state…

MassDOT Relocation Proposal Gives Way to More Pressing Issues

/
The Baker administration has recently abandoned a proposal to…

A Tale of Two Transparencies

/
Recently, we wrote about the redemption of Secretary of State…

The Convention Center Authority’s Inflated Claims

/
In the wake of our recent brief, Analyzing the Convention Center…

Post-Olympic Real Estate Implications of the Boston 2024 Proposal

/
Two weeks ago, a series of documents published by a number of…

MBTA Experiencing Severe Delays in Transparency

/
This winter the MBTA proved that it is capable of publishing…

Way off track

/
A couple of weeks ago, Ari Ofsevit wrote a pretty scathing blog…

The Single Biggest Obstacle to Reform at the MBTA

/
post by Gregory W. Sullivan & Matthew Blackbourn In…

6 Ways to Improve Government Transparency

/
Mary Connaughton, Pioneer Institute's Director of Government…

A Step Closer to the First-Class Transit System Massachusetts Deserves

/
This week, a Finance Control Board for the MBTA won the support…

There Is Little Appeal to the Current Use of Binding Arbitration at the T

/
Eliminating final and binding arbitration at the MBTA is key…