Op-ed: Justification For 40% Legislative Leadership Raises Is Political Voodoo

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

When doing the people’s will is secondary to legislators’ self-interest, how strong is our democracy? The state Legislature is on the verge of overriding the Governor’s veto of legislation that includes sizable pay raises for state and legislative leaders. Their actions on this front will answer the democracy question.

Since legislators can’t raise their base pay, the hikes are limited to leadership positions in the form of increased legislative stipends. Base pay increases are formulaic and tied to the state’s median household income.

The Boston Globe reported on several questionable aspects of the bill. It contains an “emergency preamble,” which means the raises would take effect immediately. The legislation also includes pay hikes for the judiciary, which, due to a clause in the state Constitution, makes it challenging at best to reverse via initiative petition. And because committee chairs and other leadership positions have not yet been officially selected, legislators don’t need to worry about violating conflict of interest laws for voting on their own financial interests.

In short, this was done swiftly and slickly, without public input and leaving members of the public with little recourse. Read more on WGBH News

Get Connected!


Pioneer in the News: 

The Boston Globe: 16 Mass. state workers made $100,000 or more in overtime pay last year 

The Boston Globe: Mass. reduced state payroll for the first time in years

Boston Herald: Anthony and Haller: State insurer using market clout to curb health costs

The Boston Globe: PRIM and proper? Statehouse leader’s law firm profited from ties to public retirement funds


Related Blog Posts:

In Mass, records are available on a “Why-Do-You-Need-To-Know” basis

/
Last week, MuckRock journalist Todd Feathers wrote about a recent…

For transparency advocates, with friends like Galvin …

/
A report in the Globe last week made public what those who deal…

Public Statement on the New MBTA Union Contract

PIONEER INSTITUTE PUBLIC STATEMENT ON THE NEW MBTA UNION CONTRACT Yesterday,…

Is ELD Hiding Its Real Performance?

/
The Executive Office of Elder Affairs (ELD) is an agency within…

Our View: Keep the Hotel Subsidy Out of the BCEC Expansion Bill

/
Today (Thursday), the Massachusetts State Senate is planning…

WCVB Team 5 Reports on Pioneer’s Analysis of $92M Boston Fire Contract

/
Pioneer Institute Executive Director Greg Sullivan appeared on…

Government Transparency: A Step Forward

/
Governor Deval Patrick launched the MassResults web page to…

Pioneer’s Transparency Update: “Sunshine Week” Edition

/
While sunshine in government operations should be a 365-day calling,…

Step it up, UMASS

/
You've come a long way, baby! Or maybe not. It's been 42 years…

The Dog Ate DCF’s Report Card

/
It looks like the besieged folks down at the Division of Children…

Is the Commissioner of Education Complying with the Law?

/
Twenty years after the passage of the landmark Massachusetts…

Who’s Responsible for the MBTA Retirement Fund

/
It cannot have been a particularly merry Christmas for Stephen…

Public Statement Regarding the MBTA’s Lack of Transparency

The future finances of the MBTA’s employees depend on solid…

Open Letter to the Commissioners of the Massachusetts Gaming Commission

/
Gaming Commission's Enhanced Ethics Code On October 24, 2013,…

Gaming the Gaming Commission’s “Enhanced Code of Ethics”?

/
The Boston Globe published stories on November 21st and December…

Watertown Police Department stubbornly refuses electronic public records requests

/
Despite repeated appeals to reason and official state guidance,…

An anniversary you may have missed

/
With the acrimonious standoff in Congress bringing about the…