Fare Revenue & Ridership | MBTA Fare Revenue Correlations

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on

LinkedIn

In recent weeks, many MBTA riders have expressed frustration about the T’s recent fare hike. In fact, some riders are volunteering to stand on platforms and lead a conversation about what riders can do to roll back the hike. However, the T is unlikely to budge. Even when ridership declines for a period, fare revenue continues to climb.

The last three fare hikes occurred in 2012, 2014, and 2016. While all three led to a decrease in unlinked passenger trips the following year, they generated an increase in fare revenue. In fact, fare revenue increased every year from 2007-2017, with the exception of 2010. Further, the largest increase in fare revenue actually came in a year in which ridership declined. According to Pioneer Institute’s MBTAAnalysis.com, from 2012 to 2013, fare revenue increased by 19.7% even as ridership decreased by 1.6%. Moreover, when ridership grew by 7% in 2011, its largest increase between 2007 and 2017, fare revenue only rose by 2.2%. When the T implements Automated Fare Collection 2.0 and works the early bugs out of the system, even higher revenue can be expected.

While some riders feel service quality hasn’t improved enough to merit a fare increase, state law allows the MBTA to raise fares no more than 7 percent once every two years. Further, riders should be aware that in 2017 the T was the fourth largest transportation network in the United States in unlinked passenger trips, but ranked sixth in total fare revenue.

However, the fare revenue per unlinked passenger trip increased by 60 percent between 2007 and 2017, which is nearly 20 percentage points more than its closest peer system. While a fare hike is nothing new, riders are right to demand that it correspond with improved service.

Get Our Fix the T Updates!

Related posts:

Report Calls on FMCB to Seek Legislative Intervention on Projected 18-Year, $1.485 Billion T Pension Shortfall

June 5, 2017

New evaluation commissioned by MBTA projects T contributions…

Green Line Extension gets approval from Feds, but is this really the end of the headache?

0 Comments

April 25, 2017

The proposal to extend the MBTA’s Green Line from Lechmere…

Study: Evidence Suggests MBTA Pension Low-Balled Costs And Liabilities

April 5, 2017

Quarter-century of data shows costs at up to six times valuation…

Putting The T On A Clear Path To High Performance

0 Comments

March 28, 2017

Pioneer Institute recently submitted public testimony to the…

Study Finds MBTA Had Nation’s Highest Bus Maintenance Costs In 2015

March 24, 2017

Reducing costs to average of the most similar U.S. transit systems…

The Power of Competition at the T

0 Comments

March 1, 2017

In 2015, right after record-setting snowfall shut down the region's…

Getting the T Back on Track

February 24, 2017

The reforms that the Massachusetts Legislature advanced at the…

Public Statement on Nonrenewal of Keolis Commuter Rail Contract

January 9, 2017

Pioneer Institute welcomes the news that the MBTA will not renew…

Pioneer Institute Statement On The MBTA Contract With The Carmen’s Union

December 19, 2016

In February 2015, Pioneer Institute issued a statement citing…

Study Calls For Steps Toward Terminating Troubled MBTA Retirement Fund

December 15, 2016

The MBTA should assess the feasibility of moving its employees out of the Social Security system and transfer investment management responsibility for its pension fund to the commonwealth’s Pension Reserves Investment Management board as initial steps toward terminating the MBTA Retirement Fund