Tag Archive for: Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue
https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/oped-maine-education-e1634068017899.jpg 683 1025 Charles Chieppo https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_440x96.png Charles Chieppo2021-10-09 19:13:062021-10-13 10:18:43Maine Tries to Ignore a Clear Supreme Court Ruling on Education
As the U.S. Supreme Court takes up Carson v. Makin, the facts are clear. Maine has chosen to subsidize private education. As such, it cannot disqualify all religious schools from receiving public dollars under its school choice program.
https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/BestPractices-2.jpg 1558 1926 Jamie Gass https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_440x96.png Jamie Gass2020-07-20 12:52:372021-11-23 10:50:30Education tax credit programs extend choice to families who can’t afford private schools or to move to a tony community
Thanks to the Supreme Court’s Espinoza ruling, many more students can reap the benefits of school choice
https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/Kendra-espinoza-033-e1556831862142.jpg 650 1155 Editorial Staff https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_440x96.png Editorial Staff2020-06-30 10:38:392022-06-21 10:53:04Public Statement: Pioneer Institute Applauds U.S. Supreme Court Ruling in Espinoza School Choice Case
Pioneer Institute applauds today’s U.S. Supreme Court’s decision striking down a bigoted state constitutional amendment in Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue. Like Massachusetts, Montana is among nearly 40 states with so-called anti-aid amendments, which have roots in 19th century anti-Catholic, anti-immigrant discrimination.
https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/The-Learning-Curve-5.png 512 1024 Editorial Staff https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_440x96.png Editorial Staff2020-04-10 10:51:412023-08-26 12:33:58The Institute for Justice’s Tim Keller on Espinoza v. Montana DOR & ongoing school choice litigation
This week on “The Learning Curve,” Cara and Gerard continue coverage of COVID-19’s impact on K-12 education, joined by Tim Keller, Senior Attorney with the Institute for Justice, which is representing the plaintiffs in the high-profile Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue case currently before the U.S. Supreme Court,.
https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/Jason-Bedrick-EdChoice-1.png 512 1024 Editorial Staff https://pioneerinstitute.org/wp-content/uploads/logo_440x96.png Editorial Staff2020-01-24 10:21:382023-08-26 14:11:48Dick Komer on Espinoza v. Montana & the Bigoted Legacy of Blaine Amendments
On this episode of “The Learning Curve,” Bob & Cara are joined by Dick Komer, Senior Attorney with the Institute for Justice. Komer led the oral argument this week before the U.S. Supreme Court on behalf of the plaintiffs in the high-profile school choice case, Espinoza v. Montana Department of Revenue.