Study rates every state’s telehealth laws for patient access and ease of providing services

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Los Angeles (Jan. 5, 2022) — A new report from Reason Foundation, Cicero Institute and Pioneer Institute rates every state’s telehealth policy for patient access and ease of providing virtual care.

Millions of Americans tried telehealth for the first time last year as federal officials and governors temporarily lifted restrictions that limited patient access to virtual care. But many of these restrictions on practices like speaking with doctors across state lines, recording voice messages with care instructions, and mandating insurance coverage have been reinstated, the new report finds.

“Once the public health emergency declarations started to end or executive orders were withdrawn many of the new flexibilities for providers, insurers, and patients were lost overnight,” says Vittorio Nastasi, policy analyst at Reason Foundation and co-author of the report. “States need to adopt a number of telehealth reforms to provide their residents better access to this safe and effective virtual care.”

Nationally, the study finds that several states that have been hardest hit by the pandemic have the most restrictive telehealth laws. These states include New York, California, and Connecticut which have not signed up for interstate licensing compacts and have coverage parity mandates that offer no flexibility between the insurer and provider.

Only three states — Arizona, Florida, and Indiana — allow all providers to easily practice telehealth across state lines. Forty-seven others have arbitrary barriers in place that limit patients’ access to specialists and available appointments based purely on residency.

On a positive note, almost all states have removed the requirement that a patient must first see a provider in-person before they can use telehealth services, the exception being Tennessee, while Alaska and West Virginia require an in-person visit before certain services can be provided. Another 20 states allow full independent practice for nurse practitioners without the supervision of a physician.

The report highlights telehealth policy best practices for states. “While they cannot and should not replace all in-person medical appointments, virtual visits can save patients time and help them avoid germ-filled waiting rooms. Providers can also take some pressure off overburdened systems as they can see patients from an office or home,” writes report co-author Josh Archambault, a senior fellow with Cicero Institute and Pioneer Institute.

The full report with state rankings is available online from Pioneer Institute, Reason Foundation, and Cicero Institute.

Contact

Allison Tierney, Communications Specialist, Reason Foundation, 616.550.5769, allison.tierney@reason.org

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Related Posts:

Massachusetts Health Care Transparency: Bright Enough Spotlight?

/
Massachusetts officials published online this week a database…

Pioneer Senior Fellow on PBS's NewsHour

/
Pioneer's Senior Fellow on Health Care, Amy Lischko, was interviewed…

Health Care Costs Crushing States– Is the Solution to Drop out of Medicaid?

/
The headline says it all. “States' Woes Spur Medicaid Drop-Out…

Health Care in the Mid-terms: What the Polls really tell us

/
Trying to read the tea leaves of poll numbers on the general…

American as baseball, apple pie and primary care doctors?

/
Harvard Medical School recently announced an anonymous gift of…

ObamaCare blowback

/
Great piece in the Boston Globe titled "ObamaCare blowback" by…

Unresolved Safety Net Hospital Issues

/
Mr. Keefe, First, thank you for taking the time to read my post…

Next Step in Reform: Cost Control

/
The President & CEO of Associated Industries of Massachusetts…

Feds giving a safety net to Massachusetts’s safety net hospitals?

/
Two of the most prominent “safety net” hospitals in Massachusetts…

Ths is getting ugly.

/
Today’s Globe story regarding Insurance companies' unwillingness…