Study Finds MassHealth’s Enhanced Eligibility Verification Saves $250 Million a Year

Share on Facebook

Share on Twitter

Share on

LinkedIn

Reforms fixed MassHealth’s $1.2 billion eligibility crisis, freed up money to be redirected to needy recipients

BOSTON – Enhanced eligibility verification allowed MassHealth, the Commonwealth’s Medicaid program, to save significant resources that could be redirected to the care of truly needy Medicaid recipients, according to a new study published by Pioneer Institute.

Download "MassHealth Protecting Medicaid Resources for the Most Vulnerable"

“MassHealth’s success at digging out of an eligibility crisis that cost Massachusetts at least $658 million, according to the Commonwealth’s Health Policy Commission, holds important Medicaid eligibility lessons for other states,” said Dr. William J. Oliver, author of “MassHealth Protecting Medicaid Resources for the Most Vulnerable: How Massachusetts Saved Hundreds of Millions through Enhanced Eligibility Verification.”

After the failure of initial efforts to comply with Affordable Care Act rules that required the Commonwealth to change its eligibility systems, then-Gov. Deval Patrick obtained permission to suspend mandatory annual eligibility redeterminations and extend temporary Medicaid coverage to anybody who signed up, regardless of income.

In 2014, Medicaid operated for five months without any eligibility determinations, during which time 321,000 new beneficiaries were added, expanding MassHealth enrollment to more than two million or roughly 30 percent of the state’s population. Gov. Charlie Baker ended temporary coverage and MassHealth phased in enhanced eligibility measures to stabilize the program.

MassHealth began by conducting 1.2 million manual eligibility redeterminations over five months.

Beginning in October 2016, MassHealth tested a series of new eligibility matches to improve accuracy. At the end of 2016 and into 2017, MassHealth tested and then implemented additional external data matches such as new hire and earnings data and death registry information to further refine eligibility determinations.

In total more than $1.2 billion was saved. Most of the savings came from ending temporary coverage for those who did not qualify for MassHealth, but $250 million resulted from enhanced eligibility checks through automated matches.

One key to MassHealth’s eligibility redetermination success was testing new automated matches in batch mode before rolling them out systemwide.

“Additional automated data check opportunities hold the promise of further improving the eligibility redetermination process,” said Josh Archambault, a senior fellow at Pioneer. “They include enhanced checks to verify residency, sharing eligibility information with public assistance programs, and using asset verification checks for more populations to signal changes in income that could impact Medicaid eligibility.”

About the Authors

Dr. William J. Oliver has transformed benefits eligibility systems and processes in Texas, Florida, Indiana, Pennsylvania, Mississippi and Arkansas. He has outsourced, insourced, and retooled eligibility systems for both Medicaid and human services benefits. Dr. Oliver has built, selected, and implemented leading-edge systems in hospitals, pharmacy, retail, and other industries, and has driven major benefits eligibility reform including the Mississippi Hope Bill. He is a CPA and holds a Masters in Management from MIT and a doctorate in Management from Case Western. Dr. Oliver is a Principal at The Stephen Group and is published widely on healthcare business model innovation and assessing program outcomes.

Josh Archambault is a Senior Fellow at Pioneer Institute. Prior to joining Pioneer, Josh was selected as a Health Policy Fellow at the Heritage Foundation in Washington, D.C. In the past, Josh served as a Legislative Director in the Massachusetts State Senate and as Senior Legislative Aide in the Governor’s Office of Legislative Affairs. His work has appeared or been cited in outlets such as USA Today, Wall Street Journal, The New York Times, Fox News, NPR, Boston Herald and The Boston Globe. He is the editor and coauthor of The Great Experiment: The States, The Feds, and Your Healthcare. Josh holds a Master’s in Public Policy from Harvard University’s Kennedy School and a BA in Political Studies and Economics from Gordon College.

About Pioneer

Pioneer Institute is an independent, non-partisan, privately funded research organization that seeks to improve the quality of life in Massachusetts through civic discourse and intellectually rigorous, data-driven public policy solutions based on free market principles, individual liberty and responsibility, and the ideal of effective, limited and accountable government.

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

Related Posts:

A Woman Helping a Disabled Man in a Wheelchair

New Report & Legal Analysis Suggests ICER’s Quality Adjusted Life Years Methodology Violates the Americans with Disabilities Act

February 10, 2020

A new report, "The Legality of QALY under the ADA," outlines several potential legal violations and negative implications for disabled individuals related to the adoption of the QALY approach to drug value assessment, used most prominently by ICER.

Pioneer Poll: MA Healthcare Consumers Overwhelmingly Want Price Information on Services, but Few Know How to Get It

November 4, 2019

A new Pioneer poll shows seven out of ten Massachusetts workers who get their health insurance through their employers want to know the price of a healthcare procedure before they obtain it, but most of them do not how to obtain such information, even though information is already available through their insurers’ cost estimator tools.

Value-based reimbursement, focus on middlemen in drug distribution…

As a little girl I have a dim memory of my mother taking me to…

Study Finds MassHealth’s Enhanced Eligibility Verification Saves $250 Million a Year

Get Updates On Our Healthcare Research and Events!

New Report & Legal Analysis Suggests ICER’s Quality Adjusted Life Years Methodology Violates the Americans with Disabilities Act

Pioneer Poll: MA Healthcare Consumers Overwhelmingly Want Price Information on Services, but Few Know How to Get It

Pioneer Institute to Present Results of New Consumer Poll Monday at State House Healthcare Price Transparency Event

New Report Addresses Distinct Challenges in Utilizing ICER to Assess Value of Rare Disease Treatments

Public statement on new federal rule eliminating “skimming” of dues from caregivers’ Medicaid payments

Making Healthcare Prices Accessible

U.S. HHS Secretary Alex Azar to Be Featured Speaker at Pioneer Institute’s 2019 Hewitt Healthcare Lecture

Study Finds Patient Cost for MRI Largely Unrelated to Overall Price or Insurer Contribution at 14 MA Hospitals

Study Urges Caution Before Adopting ICER Reviews to Determine Cost Effectiveness of Treatments

Study Finds MassHealth’s Enhanced Eligibility Verification Saves $250 Million a Year

Kudos To CHIA On Major Step Toward Greater Healthcare Price Transparency

Report Recommends Alternatives to Drug Pricing Transparency Legislation

Survey Shows Wide Variation in Both Overall Cost of Medical Procedure and Amount Paid by Consumers

MA Health Insurers Have Made Good Progress in Price Transparency, But Significant Work Remains

Time for Boston to open up to limited service clinics