MORE ARTICLES
Cheryl Brown Henderson on the 70th Anniversary of Brown v. Board of EducationMay 15, 2024 - 11:48 am
Examining Diversity’s Dividends: Can Studies Survive Contact with Peer ReviewMay 14, 2024 - 10:44 am
Commentary On The Senate Ways And Means Committee FY2025 Budget May 9, 2024 - 1:11 pm
POLITICO’s Peter Canellos on Justice John Marshall Harlan & Plessy v. FergusonMay 8, 2024 - 11:55 am
Promoting Policy Probity: Confessions of Hubwonk’s Humble Host at 200May 7, 2024 - 10:59 am
Statement: Pioneer Institute in Support of Accessory Dwelling UnitsMay 2, 2024 - 12:50 pm
Study: Expand Voc-Tech Seats, Don’t Require Lottery- Based AdmissionsMay 2, 2024 - 8:50 am
Colonel Peter Hayden on U.S. Cyber Command & National SecurityMay 1, 2024 - 1:52 pm
Losing Local Labor: Retaining Workers Remains a Massachusetts ChallengeApril 30, 2024 - 10:49 am
Outmigration and the Labor ForceApril 25, 2024 - 11:44 am
The Power To Take: The Use of Eminent Domain in Massachusetts
/0 Comments/in Economic Opportunity, Press Releases, Press Releases: Economic Opportunity /by Editorial StaffAuthor: Michael Malamut, Esq., New England Legal Foundation This study is the first to analyze concrete data to determine patterns in the use of eminent domain. The analysis includes a survey of law review articles, practitioners’ manuals and reported Massachusetts opinions; structured interviews with legal practitioners; and a review of Massachusetts eminent domain statutes, especially in comparison to the 1974 Model Eminent Domain Code. The Power to Take: The Use of Eminent Domain in Massachusetts
Government Effectiveness Index: A Cross-State Survey
/0 Comments/in Better Government, Press Releases, Press Releases: Government /by Editorial StaffAuthor: James Stergios, Director of Research, Pioneer Institute The central objective of the Government Effectiveness Index (GEI) is to assess how Massachusetts is doing in comparison to other states. It seeks to provide measures of effectiveness based on the efficient use of resources (inputs as a function of quantity or output) and on performance outcomes (quality of output). It does so in regard to eight “core” functions of state government (functions common to most states): K-12 educa- tion, higher education, highways, transit, state police, the judiciary, corrections, and financial administration. This first edition tests the GEI model on a sample set of six states: Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Virginia. We chose the first four com- parison […]
TEST WITH HYPERLINKS
/0 Comments/in News /byClick here to go to Google.
Toward a High-Performance Workplace: Fixing Civil Service in Massachusetts
/0 Comments/in Economic Opportunity, Press Releases, Press Releases: Economic Opportunity /by Editorial StaffAuthor: Jonathan Walters, Governing Magazine This paper is a call for continued improvement in a system that in its current form is overly bureaucratic, unresponsive, rule-bound, and control oriented. The changes suggested address three troubling trends that have been gathering momentum in Massachusetts: First, the use of “provisional” hires as a way to sidestep testing and hiring rules entirely. Second, the inclination to exempt entire classes of employees from the civil service system altogether. And third, continued difficulty on the part of specific agencies to compete for the best and brightest job candidates in what is today a fiercely competitive job market. Toward a High-Performance Workplace: Fixing Civil Service in Massachusetts
THIS IS ANOTHER TEST POST
/0 Comments/in PioneerLegal /by Scott W. GravesEtiam in gravida magna. Duis ac nisl metus. Sed a porta ante. Fusce rutrum sit amet neque et sollicitudin. Aliquam erat volutpat. Nullam ornare ex ac augue mollis placerat. Cras pharetra massa sed quam sodales ornare. In elit quam, rhoncus quis nunc ut, placerat ultrices diam.