First-of-Its-Kind Interactive Mapping Tool Reveals Extent of For-Profit Entities Benefitting from the 340B Drug Pricing Program

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on

Pioneer Institute Database Spotlights How 340B Covered Entities Utilize Thousands of Out-of-State Contract Pharmacies to Turn Profits in Program Intended to Serve Vulnerable Patients

JANUARY 11, 2023 (BOSTON, MA) – Today, Pioneer Institute released a first-of-its-kind, 50-state mapping tool and database highlighting the troubling way in which hospitals and covered entities leverage unlimited pharmacy contracts under the 340B Drug Pricing Program. Authored by Dr. Bill Smith and Dr. Robert Popovian, the easy-to-use tool and database enables policymakers, legislators, researchers, and practitioners to see the number and location of contract pharmacies for 340B covered entities in all 50 states. Pioneer Institute data visualizations illustrate the growth in the web of for-profit entities now benefitting from the 340B program, a program intended to benefit the most vulnerable patient populations.

The mapping tool features interactive data visualizations that shed light on how 340B entities have taken advantage of the contract pharmacy arrangement, including:

  • Zip code level mapping of the number of contract pharmacies in each state for every 340B covered entity, spotlighting the number of out-of-state pharmacies in high-income areas.
  • State level mapping of contract pharmacy relationships for every 340B covered entity.
  • Growth of contract pharmacy relationships with 340B covered entities since 1992, in all 50 states, including unique contract pharmacies and active contracts with those pharmacies.

“While the 340B program was created with good intentions, evidence continues to show that the program has enormous potential for abuse by for-profit pharmacy chains and pharmacy benefit managers,” said Dr. Bill Smith, Senior Fellow and Director of the Life Sciences Initiative at Pioneer Institute and primary author of the Pioneer tool. “This new tool lays bare how convoluted the 340B program is in design and how for-profit entities are now some of the principal beneficiaries of the program.”

The 340B Drug Pricing Program was established as a federal safety-net program to offer discounts on healthcare treatments to low-income and uninsured populations. In 1996, the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) issued guidance allowing 340B hospitals and other covered entities to dispense 340B drugs through an in-house pharmacy or a single external pharmacy. However, in 2010, HRSA updated its guidance to allow covered entities to contract with an unlimited number of pharmacies to purchase and dispense 340B drugs. As a result, the number of 340B contract pharmacy arrangements has exploded by 4,000% since 2010. As many as 73% of 340B contract pharmacies are large for-profit chains and pharmacy benefit managers.

“The mapping tool clearly demonstrates that powerful hospitals have established tens of thousands of contracts with for-profit entities who are securing enormous profits from the 340B program,” said Dr. Robert Popovian, Senior Visiting Health Policy Fellow at Pioneer Institute and co-author of the Pioneer tool. “There must be increased oversight of 340B covered entities’ use of contract pharmacy relationships to return the program to its original intent of supporting the most vulnerable patients.”

The scope and number of contract pharmacies create an enormous potential for abuse as pharmacies can drive profits by charging multiple discounts, such as purchasing drugs at 340B discounts and billing drug manufacturers for Medicaid rebates on the same drug, known as duplicate discounts. While duplicate discounts violate federal law, and government watchdogs have requested that pharmacies install tools to prevent them, pharmacy chains have not heeded these government requests.

Federal and state legislators and regulators can utilize this new tool to investigate, down to the zip code level, and better grasp how 340B contract pharmacies are taking advantage of the program. Recent research concluded that 340B contract pharmacy growth was concentrated in high-income neighborhoods, compared to low-income communities where the number of contract pharmacies declined.

  • Cambridge Public Health Commission, a Massachusetts-based healthcare system, has 349 contract pharmacies in the state. However, it also has 11 contract pharmacies in California, 11 in Florida, and many more across the country.
  • In Virginia, Bon Secours Richmond Community Hospital, recently the subject of an investigation into their misuse of 340B drug discounts, has a contract pharmacy in Florida and one in Arizona, in addition to contract pharmacies in neighboring states.

To view the Pioneer Institute 340B interactive mapping tool, visit


About the Authors

Dr. William S. Smith is Senior Fellow and Director of the Life Sciences Initiative at Pioneer Institute. He has 25 years of experience in government and in corporate roles, including as vice president of public affairs and policy at Pfizer, and as a consultant to major pharmaceutical, biotechnology and medical device companies. He held senior staff positions for the Republican House leadership on Capitol Hill, the White House, and in the Massachusetts Governor’s office. He earned his PhD with distinction at The Catholic University of America (CUA).

Dr. Robert Popovian is Senior Visiting Health Policy Fellow at Pioneer Institute. Dr. Popovian is the Founder of the strategic consulting firm Conquest Advisors. He previously served as Vice President, U.S. Government Relations at Pfizer. Dr. Popovian was appointed as the Chief Science Policy Officer for Global Healthy Living Foundation. He also serves on the Board of Councilors of the University of Southern California School of Pharmacy, Senior Health Policy Fellow at Progressive Policy Institute, and Board of Advisors for Equideum Health. Robert completed his Doctorate in Pharmacy and Master of Science in Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy degrees at the University of Southern California with honors.

Gauri Binoy is a research assistant at Pioneer Institute. She graduated from Cornell University with a BA in Biological Sciences and Developmental Sociology in May 2021.

About Pioneer Institute

Pioneer’s mission is to develop and communicate dynamic ideas that advance prosperity and a vibrant civic life in Massachusetts and beyond. Pioneer’s vision of success is a state and nation where our people can prosper and our society thrive because we enjoy world-class options in education, healthcare, transportation and economic opportunity, and where our government is limited, accountable and transparent. Pioneer values an America where our citizenry is well-educated and willing to test our beliefs based on facts and the free exchange of ideas, and committed to liberty, personal responsibility, and free enterprise.

Get Updates On Our Life Sciences Work!

Related Content

Issue Brief: Problems With The Institute of Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) and the QALY Methodology

This article by Chris Rochester appeared in The MacIver Institute…

Commentary: Proposed Drug Price Caps Would Stall Advances in Health Care

This op-ed by William Smith and Adam Crepeau appeared in the…

HHS Secretary Alex Azar doesn’t want drug access to become an equation

This op-ed by William Smith appeared in the Washington Examiner…

The U.S. shouldn’t use the ‘QALY’ in drug cost-effectiveness reviews

This op-ed by William Smith appeared in STAT News on February…

Baker’s Orwellian drug pricing policy

This op-ed by William Smith appeared in Commonwealth Magazine…

Key Questions for Legislators on the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER)

As states continue to grapple with prescription drug costs, a new Pioneer Institute study lays out the key ethical, methodological and disease-specific questions policy makers should address before deciding whether to contract with the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review (ICER) to conduct cost effectiveness reviews used to make decisions about the purchase of medicines and other medical innovations.

Study Urges Caution Before Adopting ICER Reviews to Determine Cost Effectiveness of Treatments

Review methodology could negatively impact elderly, the disabled,…

Will New England See Lower Prices from Drug Pricing Transparency Legislation?

This report finds that most new drug pricing transparency laws do not lower consumer out-of-pocket costs, and that expensive and onerous compliance rules would likely put upward pressure on prices. The report reviews recent New England legislative attempts to reduce costs by requiring the disclosure of wholesale drug prices and other information about industry pricing practices.

Transparency in Retail Drug Prices: Easy to Obtain but Accuracy May Be Doubtful

This paper is the fourth in a series on price transparency in the healthcare industry, and the first Pioneer report to focus on the retail price of prescription medications. Researchers called 44 retail drug stores across the state asking for the price of a 30-day supply of each drug in a common dosage. In each case the callers said they were self-pay and pressed the drug store for information about discounts.