Editorial Staff

Public Statement: Admission Bias Against Massachusetts Residents

/in , , , /by Editorial Staff
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Freshman admission to the University of Massachusetts’ flagship Amherst campus is more competitive for the Commonwealth’s students than for out-of-state applicants, as reported in Pioneer Institute’s study, “Differentiating Admissions Standards at UMass-Amherst to Meet Out-of-State Enrollment Targets.”

For instance, in the fall of 2016, the average combined SAT scores of accepted, in-state, first-time degree-seeking Massachusetts students were 23 points higher than the average of similar students accepted from out-of-state. The numbers imply that Massachusetts residents are held to a higher admissions standard. The pattern of accepting out-of-state students with lesser academic credentials than in-state students has been consistent since at least 2010, with respect to both combined SAT scores and high school grade point averages.

Solutions

There are solutions to the perverse outcome of current UMass admission policies.  One example is the University of California.  The UC system had been on course similar to UMass when a state audit found the University had lowered its standards for non-resident admissions.   In response to public outrage sparked by the audit, University officials committed to only accepting out-of-state students with higher academic qualifications than the average of accepted in-state students. Under the new practice, accepted out-of-state students at the flagship Berkeley campus in the fall of 2017 far out-performed in-state accepted students, scoring on average 115 points higher on the combined SAT. The average GPA of accepted non-resident students was also higher than their in-state counterparts. 

North Carolina provides another instructive example. To curb growing out-of-state enrollment, in 1986 the University of North Carolina capped the number of out-of-state students at 18 percent of total enrollment.  In 2016, UNC’s flagship campus at Chapel Hill was fined $1 million for exceeding its non-resident enrollment cap for the second consecutive year, with 19.5 percent of enrollees coming from out-of-state.

Massachusetts can address troubling UMass admissions trend and end the potential harm to Massachusetts students and residents.  The issue is not whether to welcome talented out-of-state or international students; the Commonwealth should strive to bring in young talent with the hope that they will one day make their homes here and contribute to growing the state economy.  The issue is that since Massachusetts taxpayers are subsidizing the UMass system — and such subsidies have grown from $519 million (2013) to $721 million (2017) in just the past four years — Massachusetts students should not be penalized for growing up here.

 

Stay Connected!

 

Related Posts

$14B in Medicare Cuts under ACA for Massachusetts

0 Comments
/
During the Presidential race, we have heard a lot about the $716…

New England Raking in $$$ for ACA Exchanges, $351 million and counting

0 Comments
/
Josh Archambault, Director of Healthcare Policy at Pioneer Institute…

Grossman wants to look squarely at reality

0 Comments
/
The treasurer’s call for a cut in the pension’s rate of return…

Rent Seeking in Mass Price Capping Law

2 Comments
/
After Moody's issued a credit negative analysis for hospitals…

Medicaid Patient Access in Mass

0 Comments
/
Yesterday the Massachusetts Medical Society released its annual…

Moody’s Report: New Mass Price Capping Law “Credit Negative” for Hospitals

0 Comments
/
In the soon to be long list of unintended consequences as…

Funny Business Ahead in Massachusetts?

0 Comments
/
Over at the Manhattan Institute, Paul Howard recently blogged…

The right reform path in Lawrence?

0 Comments
/
There are two issues that matter in K-12 education - what you…

Will Government-Directed Healthcare in Mass. Really Contain Costs?

4 Comments
/
Governor Patrick signed a new healthcare law today aimed at cost…

Pulling Back the Curtain on Beacon Hill’s “Healthcare Reform 2.0”

1 Comment
/
T-minus 13 days until the end of the legislative session and…

MBTA Doing More With Less

1 Comment
/
Rather than big dollar expansion projects, the MBTA's Key Bus…

Public Pensions and Workforce – State Police Version

0 Comments
/
The recent announcement that State Police Superintendent Marian…

POLL FINDS LIKELY MASSACHUSETTS VOTERS OVERWHELMINGLY FAVOR MORE SCHOOL CHOICE

Likely Massachusetts voters overwhelmingly support educational choice, according to a poll conducted by David Paleologos’ firm, DAPA Research, for Pioneer Institute.

HISTORY OF STATE EDUCATION DEPARTMENT SHOULD INFORM FUTURE POLICIES

A new Pioneer report calls on the state Department of Elementary and Secondary Education to focus on things it has demonstrated the ability to do well if it is to be as successful implementing the second wave of education reform as it was with the first.

Video: But Will The Cost-Cutting Bills Really Save Money?

0 Comments
/
The debate on Beacon Hill is heating up on payment reform legislation,…

Our Final Thoughts on The 38 Studios Meltdown

0 Comments
/
First and foremost, this is an economic disaster for Rhode Island…

POLL FINDS PARENTS, TEACHERS AND STATE LEGISLATORS ALL SUPPORT REINSTATEMENT OF U.S. HISTORY MCAS GRADUATION REQUIREMENT

0 Comments
/
Three stakeholder groups overwhelmingly agree that Massachusetts should focus more attention on educating public school students in U.S. history

Massachusetts’ Jobs-Unfriendly Regulatory Environment

0 Comments
/
I know this can seem like a talking point, but there's some new…