Editorial Staff

Time to End MA State Legislature’s Exemption from Public Records Law

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by Editorial Staff
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

The purpose of transparency laws is to promote more effective, accountable and responsive government. Engaged citizens are essential for our form of government to thrive over the long-term. According to the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, “the founding fathers of our nation strove to develop an open government formed on the principles of democracy and public participation. An informed citizen is better equipped to participate in the process.” Yet, despite this paramount need for the long-term health of the Commonwealth, our transparency laws remain deeply flawed.

The Public Records Law expressly states that the law “shall not apply to the records of the general court” Meaning the state legislature “exempted” itself from a most important law. Although the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the application of the legislature’s blanket exemption, it has never ruled specifically on the constitutionality of the provisions. We at Pioneer Institute believe the legislature’s exemption to this law is unconstitutional. The legislature’s exemption from public records law undermines the rights reserved to the people in the state Constitution and makes it impossible for citizens to uphold their end of the bargain by being engaged in the democratic process.

Read our Public Testimony, delivered by Mary Connaughton, Pioneer’s Director of Government Transparency, on May 4th, 2018 before the Special Legislative Commission on Public Records.

Download Public Testimony

Recent Posts:

MBTA Transparency Is Now ‘Back on Track’

0 Comments
/
Today, the MBTA released its long-anticipated performance dashboard,…

Sunshine Week 2016: Highlights from Pioneer’s Government Transparency Team

0 Comments
/
Each Sunshine Week, Pioneer shares highlights of its government…

Dropping Public Records Law Exemption is a Clear Win for Governor Baker

0 Comments
/
Currently, there are only two states that exempt the office of…

Benchmarking Tools For Municipal Officials – Budget Season Edition

0 Comments
/
Understanding how your community performs relative to its peers…

Time to End Mass. Legislature’s Self-Exemption from Open Meeting Law

PRESS RELEASE: Pioneer Contends the Legislature’s Self-Exemption…

What the Brian Joyce Saga Says about Government Transparency in Massachusetts

0 Comments
/
One state senator’s dirty laundry may be catching up with him.…

How Responsive Are Massachusetts State Agencies?

0 Comments
/
According to Massachusetts public records law, an agency has…

MBTA commuter rail should release on-time data from every station every day

0 Comments
/
As Pioneer has pointed out numerous times in the past, the MBTA…

MBTA Management Discussions: Where Did They Go?

0 Comments
/
The government works for the people. As with any employee, the…

Thoughts on Transparency: Full Disclosure of Gasoline Taxes

0 Comments
/
One of Pioneer Institute’s ongoing goals is to promote government…

MBTA Performance Transparency: A Whole New Meaning to Deferred Maintenance

0 Comments
/
Governments need to adapt to the evolving needs of constituents,…

Our Government Transparency Resolutions for 2016

1 Comment
/
While it's possible that 2016 will see an historic surge…

Two States, Two Bills, Two Different Takes on Transparency

0 Comments
/
This week, Florida State Representative Greg Steube and Senator…

Document Request Reveals Which Commuter Rail Trains Are Frequently Delayed

0 Comments
/
There is a unique relationship between the MBTA and its riders…

Massachusetts Needs Its Own CBO

0 Comments
/
State Senator Jamie Eldridge is on to something.  The State…