Is there an explosion in state government employment? Yup.

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on

shell game 2

We’ve been at this one with the administration for a few years now, and every time we ask about a dataset that strongly suggests that there has been outsized growth in state employment, we get stammering replies about a one-month, one-quarter, or one-year fluctuation that goes in the other direction.

Since that time, we have sought apples-to-apples information on employment to monitor changes in government employment. There are several ways to get at the question of changes in state government employment (see the three principal ones below). To give you clarity, I thought it would be useful to post up the three major data sets. On each of the measures, we observe an increase in state employment of between 10.9 and 16 percent since 2004:

  • All state employees
        (13.9% increase): The Bureau of Labor Statistics provides numbers that are comprehensive and include all state authorities and agencies. By

    BLS statistics

      , Massachusetts state government has grown by 15,600 positions, from 112,100 in December 2004 to 127,700 in December 2012.
  • Budgeted state workers
        (16%): Official state bond offering documents provide the number of budgeted state workers.

    Those official state bond statistics

      indicate that state government employment has grown by 11,992 positions, from 74,741 in 2004 to 86,733 in 2012.
  • State employees excluding quasi-governmental employees
        (10.9%): The state’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report includes the total state workforce (excluding quasi-governmental agencies).

    According to the state’s 2012 CAFR

      , state government has increased the number of positions by 8,342, from 76,120 in 2004 to 84,462 in 2012.

During budget times especially, this is a story, dear newspapers.

Follow me on twitter at @jimstergios, or visit Pioneer’s website.

7 replies
  1. DorothyMA
    DorothyMA says:

    During budget times caused by recessions (and stupid tax cuts) is when people need government services.

  2. philips66
    philips66 says:

    During budget crisis caused by a gov’t created recession, this is when people need jobs. Reducing the BIG gov’t bloat (ie cutting the gov’t workforce by 10-15%) will create private sector jobs, which sustain the government.

  3. DorothyMA
    DorothyMA says:

    By cutting jobs, we’ll create jobs. Genius!

    Seriously though, for whatever it’s worth, we’ve been cutting and cutting in MA.

  4. philips66
    philips66 says:

    Seriously, reduce the size of gov’t reduces the tax burden, and could put some money back in the pockets of the taxpayers, who would then spend more and get the economy moving. Being this is Mass, that will never happen but should.
    You lost any chance at credibility by claiming we have been cutting here in Mass. The truth is, the state gov’t keeps getting bigger and bigger, and keeps costing more and more. Which is why our taxes and fees keep rising, which takes $ out of the taxpayers pockets and slows the economy. Pioneer Institute themselves are proving this, read their report on the Mass state gov’t growth. Every year the state gov’t grows.

  5. philips66
    philips66 says:

    FYI- It’s true, the gov’t forced banks to give home loans to poor people who obviusly shouldn’t have gotten the loans. It all started in the mid 90’s, you should do some research. The recession was caused by a gov’t created scheme. Facts are stubborn things.

  6. philips66
    philips66 says:

    You call this a fact? ” we’ve been cutting and cutting in MA. ” Increasing the size of gov’t is cutting now? Apparently you didn’t read this article?
    For the record, this is what I consider a fact: “Massachusetts state government has grown by 15,600 positions, from 112,100 in December 2004 to 127,700 in December 2012.”

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *