Should the federal government provide free, universal child care?

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

This op-ed appeared in The Boston Globe.

NO – Jamie Gass, Director of education research and policy at Pioneer Institute, a Boston-based think tank; Newton resident

The states must “be considered as essential, component parts of the Union,” founding father Alexander Hamilton declared in 1788, “and therefore the idea of sacrificing the former to the latter is wholly inadmissible.”

Free, universal child care provided by the federal government would be contrary to the spirit of the Founders’ view of K-12 education as the constitutional domain of state and local governments. Nevertheless, in the 55 years since President Lyndon Johnson established the federal Head Start program, some policymakers have advocated for nationalizing early childhood education, in part as a way to help fight poverty.

A policy brief I helped co-author in May reveals that the federal government today provides approximately 69 preschool and early childhood education subsidies across 10 federal agencies, costing US taxpayers around $25 billion annually. The largest and most expensive of these programs is Head Start, which cost more than $10 billion in fiscal 2020, or $240 billion since 1965.

What are the results?

According to the 2019 National Assessment of Educational Progress, known as the “nation’s report card,” national fourth-grade reading scores were a mere three points higher than in 1992.

In 2012, the Department of Health and Human Services, which administers Head Start, released an updated rigorous study that tracked 5,000 3- and 4-year-old children through the end of third grade. It found that Head Start had little or no sustained impact on the cognitive development of the study’s participants.cq The findings show that the model for any federally driven early childhood education has failed spectacularly at fulfilling its own promises.

As the movie version of the popular Broadway musical “Hamilton” sweeps the nation, let’s recommit ourselves to the framers’ wisdom about education and federalism.

This could be accomplished by sunsetting Head Start and dozens of other federal early childhood education programs over the next decade. In the interim, they should be turned into block grants that would allow states to make preschool dollars portable to follow eligible children to the private provider of their choice. Finally, states could authorize more early-grade charter public schools to better serve the urban kids who are most in need of academic-quality early childhood education.

Get Updates on Our Education Research

Related Content:

Op-ed: Time to lift up Boston’s voc-tech high school

/
Read this full op-ed in CommonWealth magazine. By Tom Birmingham…

Op-ed: Charters, Unions, And Public School Funding

/
Read this full op-ed on WGBH News. In the midst of the 2016…

Op-ed: A Novel Solution To An Old Problem

/
By Tom Birmingham  | The Boston Pilot  |  December 15, 2017 We…

Op-ed: Our schools ignore US history at our peril

/
By Tom Birmimgham | Nov. 30, 2017 State must make good on requirement…

Op-ed: Education establishment ruining reform

/
This op-ed appeared in the Boston Herald on Wednesday, November…

Op-ed: It’s Time to Strengthen—Not Reduce!—History in Our Classrooms

/
By Tom Birmingham This op-ed appeared in the print edition…

Op-ed: Students should know the name Fannie Lou Hamer

/
This op-ed has appeared in WGBH News and The Berkshire Eagle. October…