MORE ARTICLES
Mapping Mass Migration – Remote Workers: The Most Mobile ResidentsJanuary 9, 2025 - 2:18 pm
Statement on MBTA Communities Law Milton RulingJanuary 8, 2025 - 3:36 pm
Harvard’s Leo Damrosch on Alexis de Tocqueville & Democracy in AmericaJanuary 8, 2025 - 9:57 am
Mapping Mass Migration: Massachusetts Remains a Top Destination for ImmigrantsJanuary 6, 2025 - 10:29 am
Mapping Mass Migration: New Census Data Shows Continued Out-Migration from Massachusetts to Competitor StatesDecember 19, 2024 - 8:52 am
UK’s John Suchet, OBE, on Tchaikovsky, The Nutcracker, & BalletsDecember 18, 2024 - 9:40 am
Tim’s Take: An Education Reform Stalwart Takes a Curious Look at Homeschoolers With ESAsDecember 12, 2024 - 1:10 pm
U-OK’s Dan Hamlin on Emerging School Models & Learning LossDecember 11, 2024 - 10:20 am
What To Do About 340BDecember 11, 2024 - 9:47 am
Pioneer Institute Offers Blueprint for Federal Administrative ReformDecember 10, 2024 - 9:06 am
Our charters are especially good
/0 Comments/in Blog, News /byOur charters are different. Massachusetts staked out non-ideological ground in creating the charter school approval and accountability processes. We did not just say to all comers — Oh, you want to start a charter, sure. After all, charters are public schools and they use public dollars. With this thinking in mind, Massachusetts developed a thorough vetting and planning process for applicants. The Department of Elementary and Secondary Education (once upon the Department of Education) works to ensure that any proposal advanced by the Commissioner to the Board of Education is one worthy of consideration. Only a handful get past in any one year. This year only one was approved (ahem, with some unfortunate strings attached). We also close down charters […]
Assignment Desk: Pension Obligation Bonds
/0 Comments/in Blog, Blog: Better Government, News /byPension Obligation Bonds were one method that a number of municipalities used to ‘fund’ their unfunded pension liabilities. The thinking was that issuing bonds at a fixed rate, then putting that money into the pension fund (where it hypothetically earned a return higher than the fixed rate) made sense. There is some logic here — it turns the somewhat malleable notion of the yearly pay-in to the pension fund into a hard number owed to bond holders. And, over the long run, most pension funds earned in excess of the typical bond interest rate. But, we are in a brutal short-term (we hope) downturn with massive losses across almost all investment classes. Bloomberg has an article on a number of […]
A Private Lottery?
/0 Comments/in Blog, Blog: Better Government, News /byTreasurer Cahill floated the notion of privatizing the lottery yesterday and today. Several legislators were quick to dismiss it out of hand, which I believe is a mistake. The skeptics seemed locked into the notion that a long-term lease of the lottery requires a large, upfront payment. While the lottery provides a vital flow of funds to cities and towns, it clearly reaching the limits of its market, given the erratic nature of revenues over the past few years and the potential competition that slots/casinos/whatever might provide. Would it be possible to have a serious conversation about what a long-term lease might look like and what the state would prioritize in an RFP? Would a potential bidder guarantee a predictable […]
Businesses propose taxing consumers!!
/0 Comments/in Blog, Blog: Better Government, News /byMy friends in the business community came out yesterday for a 25 cent increase in the gas tax to pay for needed infrastructure. Of course, given that consumers (by and large) will end up paying the tab, this was not a particularly risky announcement. And not a particularly popular one outside of 128 — see here and here.
Ok, this is awkward
/1 Comment/in Blog, Blog: Better Government, News /byMassport raised its parking fees by $1 last month after its Board of Directors gave their Executive Director, by unanimous vote and without discussion, the power to adjust rates. New Transportation Secretary Aloisi is criticizing the increase, in part because their was no public input to the process. I suspect that it also makes the $2 fee that the state wanted to place on Logan parkers more difficult to sell politically. And now the awkward part — the same Transportation Secretary Aloisi (who is criticizing the increase) was a member of the Massport board that voted unanimously and without discussion to give the Executive Director the power to increase that fee.