What To Do Once Common Core Is Halted (by Sandra Stotsky)

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on

What could states do once implementation of Common Core’s standards is halted? Most states are unlikely to want to return to the standards they once had, mainly because their boards and departments of education loudly claimed they were adopting more rigorous standards when they adopted Common Core. In most cases, they would be rightly accused of returning to equally non-rigorous standards.

It will also be difficult for 45 state boards and departments of education to say to the public and their state legislators that Common Core’s standards are really not more rigorous than what they had because they will look foolish. How can they justify having voted to adopt Common Core’s standards and committing the state to huge future technological and professional development expenses in implementing standards that were not necessarily better than what they already had and that had many hidden strings attached.

Nor will they be able to explain exactly how they were not more rigorous. Most states never tried to show exactly how Common Core’s standards were more rigorous than what they had, mostly because they couldn’t. Crosswalks simply showed coverage—broadly speaking—and were dependent on subjective judgments. State boards of education and department of education staff have simply repeated like parrots that Common Core’s standards are more rigorous (clearer, promote critical thinking and deeper learning, etc.). They still don’t understand what to look at for rigor.

As a long-time reviewer of all states’ ELA standards I can agree that most states’ standards were, overall, pretty bad in ELA. So, most of these 45 states need to move on. And move on, they must, because public education is not in good shape and hasn’t been in good shape for over 40 years. What can states do to save face and do the right thing? Here are a few possibilities.

1. Legislatures (not state departments of education) should set up committees of academic experts from a state’s own colleges and universities to work out secondary standards with a range of high school teachers. Their goal would be to prepare different levels of standards for different levels of achievement (some for different colleges and universities), but all of which meet high school diploma requirements. Not all standards need to aim for college admission. Algebra II, for example, should not be required for a high school diploma.

2. Legislatures and governors should work out a plan for a network of specialized high schools across a state, supported where possible by local industry and business, and developed by experts in state industries as well as by academic experts. We need high school curriculum options for young adolescents to choose from, to address the drop-out problem and to allow students with musical, artistic, linguistic, or mathematics/science interests and talents the opportunity to develop them while in their early teens. Governors and state legislatures should oppose the latest administration idea that all American high schools should become technical/career high schools. A place for specialization in the humanities and foreign languages needs to be maintained.

3. If states want state standards, they should adopt their own revisions of the best state standards in the country, revised first for the secondary level by experts in higher education and high school teachers, and then for the elementary level by teachers in K-6. The elementary standards should aim for and connect to the secondary ones (not vice versa). The proposed standards should go through all the procedures used in a state to engage public discussion and agreement.

We don’t need the same standards in every state in the country. We can continue to find out how states compare with each other on National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) tests. We can continue to participate in TIMSS (The Trends in the International Mathematics and Science Survey), as a country and as individual states, to find out how our students as a whole, and in each state, compare with other countries in mathematics and science. And we can continue to let local school boards respond to local needs, something they have always done.

4. To strengthen the mathematics curriculum in order to make all students (including special education and ESL students) internationally competitive, state legislatures could provide funding to local schools for Singapore’s original mathematics program for K-6 and for grades 7 and 8 (all available in English and designed for students whose first language is not English).

5. To strengthen their ELA curriculum and eliminate the pedagogical nonsense propagated by the “chief architect” of Common Core’s ELA standards (e.g., “cold” reading of historical documents and a 50/50 division of reading instruction between “informational” texts and literature), states could begin with the curriculum framework I have made available at no charge on the ALSCW website and encourage local districts to design a coherent curriculum that addresses the standards in this document.  They should build in study of works by authors who were born in and/or wrote about the state. Mississippi had a first-class high school syllabus for a course on state-born authors that could serve as a model to other states.

6. Above all, legislatures need to raise the academic bar for those who are admitted to education training programs in their education schools, whether for administrators or teachers. That should be the first step. This paper contains a number of suggestions that could be put in place by a state legislature.

10 replies
  1. kenvandoren
    kenvandoren says:

    #6. ….raise bar…..

    Better yet, CLOSE all “schools of education,” as they have been abysmal failures, more in tune with indoctrination than education, more inclined toward teaching WHAT to think than HOW to think.

    To be sure, not all math majors would make good teachers, but on the other hand, not all math teachers have that good a grasp of their subject, and are bad teachers despite their “education” or because of their indoctrination.

  2. Gary
    Gary says:

    Some of us are trying to teach how to think. I call it making test makers not just test takers. Teaching students how to take notes, how to think, how to compare, contrast, analyze, evaluate …. I have had many an adult not able to answer questions I give to 6th graders. One of the social studies questions: “Analyze the geographic and forms of Peru and Argentina and evaluate how the landforms affect the government, economy, culture, and future of the two countries. Complete a compare and contrast diagram identifying these same five areas of evaluation and then identify which country you would prefer to live and why.” That was a real question for 6th graders. I do not think I am a bad teacher.

  3. kenvandoren
    kenvandoren says:

    Pretty sophisticated question for a 6th grader, and answer could be slanted by the bias of the instructional material. In another realm that I am more familiar with, take this question:

    “Show how the free market has failed, causing the crash of 2008 and how government intervention might be used to get the economy on track,”

    The question presumes that we have a free market economy, and does not address the many ways that intervention has contributed to the economic downturn, and any intervention now has at least the risk of being a contributing factor in the next economic downturn.

    Moreover, it ignores that there are almost always unintended consequences with every intervention. (eg: subsidize college education, Colleges increase tuition and prof salaries offsetting much if not all of the “help.”)

    Re: note taking. Good point, but to show how confused many educrats are, the local school admin was on radio, telling how with “group assignments,” things can be done more efficiently. She said for example, that ONE person could take notes and share, while others explored other options when teacher was speaking. I do not know how that could be more wrong-headed. I find that by taking notes, I am more likely to retain what is presented, EVEN IF I NEVER REFER TO THE NOTES AGAIN. Moreover, most people have strengths and weaknesses and I might take a different set of notes based on what I need that might not be suitable for the needs of others. I often find that by taking some notes, I can recall much of what I did not write down, especially when I refer to them later. Her group orientation surely means that few if any students will learn as much as if they ALL took notes.themselves.

  4. NancyEH
    NancyEH says:

    Ms. Stotsky should do a bit more research about her assertion that “[American] public education is not in good shape and hasn’t been in good shape for over 40 years.” It’s actually doing quite well – despite widespread poverty, attacks on teachers and diminishing school budgets.

    Here’s only one of many reports she might want to read: http://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2013/01/why-gloomy-pundits-and-politicians-are-wrong-about-americas-education-system/267278/

  5. Karen Bracken
    Karen Bracken says:

    I believe Dr. Stotsky is more qualified to speak to the subject of standards and education than you. She was on the Common Core validation committee (she refused to sign off on the final documents) and SHE Is responsible for turning MA from an F rated system to an A. MA was not only recognized nationally they were recognized internationally as well. American education HAS been in the tank and by design. They want obedient workers not thinking individuals. They know in order to control a people they must indoctrinate a complete generation of people. I would surely listen to what Dr. Stotsky has to say before you or many other so called intellects. The one real anwer to our problems is to SHUT DOWN THE US DEPT. OF EDUCATION and do it yesterday!!!

  6. Tchr4lifeinNC
    Tchr4lifeinNC says:

    It may work in other states to have their Legislators create these committees; however, I don’t feel I could trust the NC Legislature to do anything. Reason, they have continually attacked teachers and public ed. Here’s to hoping!

  7. tabithakorol
    tabithakorol says:

    I can’t imagine calling our schools failures when their graduates have produced the greatest nation in the history of the world. Whom else could you credit with such scientific achievements, medical improvements, and even space travel! Of course, the recent changes in the textbooks and curricula are due to outside forces that apparently hit us by surprise. I reviewed several books (3 human geography and one history) and immediately realized that they have been severely warped, against America, against Judaism and Christianity, done by Islamists who ignore their true bloody history and present a white-washed revisionist history that never existed. We have to rid ourselves of the evil, but there are some great educators out there who still want to save this country

  8. kenvandoren
    kenvandoren says:

    Yes, some, but the system selects against them, and that will only be intensified under Common Core

  9. kenvandoren
    kenvandoren says:

    Diminshing school budgets- that is a joke, right? Except MAYBE for the last couple years or so, education has increased in cost far in excess of CPI. About 2.5 times if memory serves.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *