Editorial Staff

Time to End MA State Legislature’s Exemption from Public Records Law

/0 Comments/in , , , , /by Editorial Staff
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

The purpose of transparency laws is to promote more effective, accountable and responsive government. Engaged citizens are essential for our form of government to thrive over the long-term. According to the Secretary of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, “the founding fathers of our nation strove to develop an open government formed on the principles of democracy and public participation. An informed citizen is better equipped to participate in the process.” Yet, despite this paramount need for the long-term health of the Commonwealth, our transparency laws remain deeply flawed.

The Public Records Law expressly states that the law “shall not apply to the records of the general court” Meaning the state legislature “exempted” itself from a most important law. Although the Supreme Judicial Court upheld the application of the legislature’s blanket exemption, it has never ruled specifically on the constitutionality of the provisions. We at Pioneer Institute believe the legislature’s exemption to this law is unconstitutional. The legislature’s exemption from public records law undermines the rights reserved to the people in the state Constitution and makes it impossible for citizens to uphold their end of the bargain by being engaged in the democratic process.

Read our Public Testimony, delivered by Mary Connaughton, Pioneer’s Director of Government Transparency, on May 4th, 2018 before the Special Legislative Commission on Public Records.

Download Public Testimony

Recent Posts:

Getting Tough on Keolis?

0 Comments
/
You rush to feed your kids breakfast; leave your house so fast…

Baker Public Records Announcement a Great Start – So Long as it’s a Start

0 Comments
/
These last few weeks have been hectic for transparency advocates…

Problems with Potholes in Boston

0 Comments
/
Boston has a pothole problem. Or, more accurately, Boston has…

The Control Board Needs to Insist on Transparency with Keolis

0 Comments
/
On July 21, the special panel created to address failures at…

MBTA gets an F for Public Records Law Compliance

0 Comments
/
Ten days. That is how long it is supposed to take for a Massachusetts…

Why Are Tuition and Fees Rising at UMass?

0 Comments
/
Over the last half-century, college tuition costs have exploded…

Our Letter to the Open Meeting Advisory Commission

0 Comments
/
Public trust and citizen engagement is fundamental in a healthy…

For Massachusetts Public Records law, a Little Progress Goes a Long Way

0 Comments
/
Earlier this month, Massachusetts transparency advocates celebrated…

An Open Request to the State Ethics Commission

0 Comments
/
When the State Ethics Commission was created in 1978 under Section…

Making Financial Disclosures “Available for Public Inspection”

0 Comments
/
Chapter 268B, Section 3(d) of Massachusetts General Laws provides…

No Fare! MBTA Tight on Public Records

0 Comments
/
The MBTA has been attracting a lot of attention lately on how…

Survey: Price Information Difficult to Obtain From Massachusetts Hospitals

View media coverage of this report on WCVB-TV 5 Investigates:…

A Pretty Much Guaranteed Free Ride

0 Comments
/
There's no such thing as a free ride. Ask any accountant and…

Massachusetts Financial Disclosures – Weak and Out of Reach

0 Comments
/
In the last five years, 250 public servants in Massachusetts…

What Court Documents Show About Compensation at the MBTA vs. Peer Communities

0 Comments
/
Introduction As the Baker Administration works with the state…

MassDOT Relocation Proposal Gives Way to More Pressing Issues

0 Comments
/
The Baker administration has recently abandoned a proposal to…

A Tale of Two Transparencies

0 Comments
/
Recently, we wrote about the redemption of Secretary of State…