Our report reveals that:
- Only eight events booked at the BCEC over the next 13 years – not 18 as the MCCA has claimed – have escape clauses that allow them to go elsewhere if expansion doesn’t go forward.
- Despite claims that the facility would not be able to host the BIO conference again without expansion, the show is booked five times between 2021 and 2029 without expansion-related escape clauses. Boston will likely have no problem hosting BIO going forward since the event is now one-third smaller than when it was held at the BCEC in 2007 and it is not forecast to grow.
- The convention center authority is dramatically overstating its economic impact.
Related research and posts:
- Analyzing the Convention Center Authority’s Inflated Claims
- The Boston Convention Center’s shrinking market
- Should We Build It? Two Views on the Merits of Boston’s Proposed Convention Center
- Does Boston Convention & Exhibition Center Expansion Really Pay for Itself?
- Flawed Forecasts: A Critical Look at Convention Center Feasibility Studies
- If We Build It Will They Come? And Other Questions About the Proposed Boston Convention Center
- Challenging Convention(al) Wisdom: Hard Facts About the Proposed Boston Convention Center
-
Convention Center Expansion Pricetag: $5 Billion in Foregone Revenue
-
WGBH News Commentary: Does Expanding The Convention Center Make Economic Sense?
-
6 Reasons Gov. Patrick Should Veto the Convention Center Expansion Bill
-
Our View: Keep the Hotel Subsidy Out of the BCEC Expansion Bill