If approved by voters, the ballot question would place a 4 percent surtax on households and thousands of Massachusetts businesses that in any one year have income exceeding $1 million. Proponents of the initiative claim the measure would raise an additional $2 billion annually for education and transportation.
As the MHTC letter and a Pioneer report issued in March demonstrate, the reality isn’t that simple.
In 2018, the SJC struck down an identically worded version of the tax proposal. During oral argument, lawyers for the Attorney General and those arguing that the proposed amendment’s wording was unconstitutional responded affirmatively when the late Chief Justice Ralph Gants asked if, under the proposal, it was possible for legislators to divert current education and transportation funds to other purposes and simply make up the shortfalls with the revenues from the new tax.
Tellingly, states that have passed new taxes ostensibly meant to increase investments in specific priority areas have done exactly that. In California, which approved a new tax in 2012 supposedly “dedicated” to education, overall education funding remained largely unchanged because funds previously dedicated to education were diverted to other purposes.
In Massachusetts attempts to require that new revenues associated with the tax amendment go to education and transportation have been rebuffed. In fact, state lawmakers have twice rejected proposals to direct all new tax revenues to education and transportation.
People deserve to know what they’re voting for. A description of next year’s ballot initiative that misleads voters into believing that a “yes” vote will automatically increase overall education and transportation funding in Massachusetts falls short of that basic standard.
Oops! We could not locate your form.
Related Posts:
Pioneer Institute Statement on Question 1
Pioneer Institute Expects That Massachusetts Taxpayers Will Be Refunded $3.2B Due To State Revenue Cap
Survey of Business Sentiment: MA Income Tax Hike Would Lead to Employer Exodus
As States Compete for Talent and Families, Massachusetts Experienced a Six-Fold Increase in Lost Wealth Compared to a Decade Earlier
Book Reveals How Tax Hike Amendment Would Damage Commonwealth’s Economic Competitiveness
Study: Legislature Likely to Reduce Spending on Education and Transportation from Other Revenue Sources, Replace Cuts with Surtax Money
Pioneer Supports Legal Challenge to Misleading Tax Ballot Language, Releases Video
Study: Tax Up For A Vote In November Would Ensnare Over Three Times More Taxpayers Than Previously Estimated
Study: “Millionaire’s Tax” Would Have Far-Reaching Effects on “Pass-Through” Businesses
Study Warns that New Hampshire Tax Policies Would Exacerbate Impacts of a Graduated Income Tax
Study Finds SALT Deduction Cap, Graduated Income Tax Will Combine to More Than Double Tax Burden on Some Households
This Is No Time for a Tax Increase
Study Finds Deep Flaws in Advocates’ Claims that the Massachusetts Tax Code is Regressive
Study Says Interstate Tax Competition, Relocation Subsidies Exacerbate Telecommuting Trends
