In the 1840s, nativist movement leaders formed official political parties and local chapters of the national Native American Party (later the American Party), although they continued to be commonly known as the Know-Nothing Party. Politicians sought to insert provisions into state constitutions against Catholics who refused to renounce the pope. The Know-Nothing movement brought bigotry and hatred to a new level of violence and organization.
The party’s legacy endured in the post-Civil War era, with laws and constitutional amendments it supported, still today severely limiting parents’ educational choices. A federal constitutional amendment was proposed by Speaker of the House James Blaine prohibiting money raised by taxation in any State to be under the control of any religious sect; nor shall any money so raised or lands so devoted be divided between religious sects or denominations. These were then named the Blaine Amendments of 1875.
in recent decades, often in response to challenges to school choice programs, the U.S. Supreme Court has demonstrated great interest in examining the issues of educational alternatives and attempts limit parental options. Massachusetts plays a key role in this debate. The Bay State was a key center of the Know-Nothing movement and has the oldest version of Anti-Aid Amendments in the nation, as well as a second such amendment approved in 1917. Two-fifths of Massachusetts residents are Catholic, and its Catholic schools outperform the state’s public schools, which are the best in the nation.
The Week in Review
/0 Comments/in Blog, News, Related Education Blogs /by Liam DayIt certainly has been a busy one, both nationally and here at Pioneer. We are set to release a short policy brief on the inequities in Unemployment Insurance in Massachusetts and are gearing up for an education event Tuesday to discuss issues around student test data, including MCAS, TIMSS, the state’s data warehouse and the need to use data to guide professional development and inform classroom practice. For that reason, I saved up my thoughts this week for one weekend post. Here goes; from lightest to most serious.
1) This week’s sign of the apocalypse – According to The Week (a periodical I’ve trumped here before) a Colorado inmate is suing the prison where he is incarcerated because he was badly hurt when trying to escape from it. I’m sorry; that one was just too good not to pass on.
2) The other election – Yes, there was another heartbreaking election this week and my boyhood hero Jim Ed Rice fell just 16 votes shy of election to baseball’s Hall of Fame. To make matters worse, the only player who achieved election this year was hated Yankee reliever Goose Gossage, who, if you remember correctly, during an era when some sort of curse seemed to plague the Red Sox, enticed Jim Ed to fly out with two on and one out in the bottom of the ninth in 1978’s historic one-game play-off.
3) Tackling the important issues – University of Georgia President Michael Adams stepped up to address the most pressing issue in higher ed today: the lack of a playoff system for college football’s Bowl Championship Series. It seems he felt his school’s team had been unfairly excluded from competing for a national title. Never mind that, according to statistics provided by the Boston Globe’s Derrick Jackson, only 29% of the African-American players on that team are graduating from school, a school whose president seems to think winning games is more important than closing the persistent achievement gap between black and white students. I wonder that other educators don’t try a similar sleight-of-hand: focus the public’s attention on ephemera so that they don’t notice their children aren’t learning.
One reason we do not pay teachers more
/0 Comments/in Blog, News, Related Education Blogs /byPassed on by a friend is the shocking bulge in hiring for grades K-8: In the past year, there were 52,000 new K-8 students nationwide, and 42,500 new K-8 teachers hired.
Why can’t teacher salaries go up? Might have something to do with hiring too many.
Minute Clinics are coming
/0 Comments/in Better Government, Blog, Blog: Better Government, Expanding Healthcare Access, Healthcare /by Steve PoftakThis space has been a supporter of in-store limited service clinics in the past. And the state’s Public Health Council, despite some misgivings, just approved the regulations which will allow these clinics to begin opening. And good for them, they approved blanket regulations, not just case-by-case waivers, which would tied the process up in red tape.
But then, Mayor Menino steps into the frame with a vociferous and very public condemnation of the clinics. Its not clear to this writer why he’s so focussed on the issue.
Sure, these clinics bring up some clear issues about our healthcare delivery system — discontinuity of care, fragmented recordkeeping, etc. But, guess what, these problems exist today and will exist tomorrow, regardless of the clinics.
In the meantime, they offer an alternative source of care at a time and place that is convenient to a lot of us, at no cost to the government and with the potential to move a lot of low-acuity patients out of the hospitals.