MORE ARTICLES
Innovation Reduction Act: Price Controls’ Prescription for New TherapiesJanuary 31, 2023 - 10:51 am
Award-Winning UK Author & Filmmaker Laurence Rees on the Holocaust, Auschwitz, and RemembranceJanuary 27, 2023 - 8:58 am
The Debate Over Rent Control Re-Emerges Amid Housing CrisisJanuary 26, 2023 - 11:01 am
D.C.’s Kevin Chavous on National School Choice WeekJanuary 25, 2023 - 11:23 am
Introducing the Newest Members of Pioneer Institute’s Board of DirectorsJanuary 25, 2023 - 8:00 am
Residents Rescuing Refugees: Welcoming Ukrainians Yearning To Breathe FreeJanuary 24, 2023 - 10:21 am
Pioneer Institute Mourns the Passing of Tom BirminghamJanuary 21, 2023 - 8:17 pm
Pulitzer Winner Prof. David Garrow on the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. and the Civil Rights MovementJanuary 18, 2023 - 10:14 am
Sinking U.S. Shipping: Ineffective Law Creates Waves for American EconomyJanuary 17, 2023 - 10:52 am
First-of-Its-Kind Interactive Mapping Tool Reveals Extent of For-Profit Entities Benefitting from the 340B Drug Pricing ProgramJanuary 11, 2023 - 7:43 am
Build More or Manage Better? Subsidized Housing in Massachusetts
/0 Comments/in Economic Opportunity, Press Releases, Press Releases: Economic Opportunity /by Editorial StaffAuthors: Howard Husock and David J. Bobb Increases in the price of rental housing in Massachusetts during the economic boom of the 1990s have spurred a push to construct additional subsidized housing. This reportpresents alternatives to construction that could significantly increase the available supply of subsidized housing. The study compares public and subsidized housing in Boston and the Commonwealth to other cities and states in terms of subsidized units per capita, vacancy rates, overhousing rates, and average tenancy tenure. The data indicate opportunities for both state and city housing authorities to manage more effectively the existing stock of public and subsidized housing. Build More or Manage Better? Subsidized Housing in Massachusetts
Comparing the Clinical Quality and Cost of Secondary Care in Academic Health Centers and in Community Hospitals
/0 Comments/in News /by Editorial StaffThis study analyzes data from hospitals in six states, including Massachusetts, to compare the cost and quality of secondary care for under-65, privately insured patients in Academic Health Centers (AHCs) and non-AHC or community hospitals. Six measures of clinical quality of care were chosen from “potentially avoidable adverse hospital outcomes” developed by the Healthcare Utilization Project (HCUP) of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. The authors discuss the research finding in the context of changes in the market for health insurance, including the emergence of “consumer-driven” health insurance products. The study population is the most likely group to be enrolled in the emerging insurance products that encourage consumers to make health care choices on the basis of cost and […]
The Power To Take: The Use of Eminent Domain in Massachusetts
/0 Comments/in Economic Opportunity, Press Releases, Press Releases: Economic Opportunity /by Editorial StaffAuthor: Michael Malamut, Esq., New England Legal Foundation This study is the first to analyze concrete data to determine patterns in the use of eminent domain. The analysis includes a survey of law review articles, practitioners’ manuals and reported Massachusetts opinions; structured interviews with legal practitioners; and a review of Massachusetts eminent domain statutes, especially in comparison to the 1974 Model Eminent Domain Code. The Power to Take: The Use of Eminent Domain in Massachusetts
Government Effectiveness Index: A Cross-State Survey
/0 Comments/in Better Government, Press Releases, Press Releases: Government /by Editorial StaffAuthor: James Stergios, Director of Research, Pioneer Institute The central objective of the Government Effectiveness Index (GEI) is to assess how Massachusetts is doing in comparison to other states. It seeks to provide measures of effectiveness based on the efficient use of resources (inputs as a function of quantity or output) and on performance outcomes (quality of output). It does so in regard to eight “core” functions of state government (functions common to most states): K-12 educa- tion, higher education, highways, transit, state police, the judiciary, corrections, and financial administration. This first edition tests the GEI model on a sample set of six states: Massachusetts, Michigan, New Jersey, Ohio, Rhode Island, and Virginia. We chose the first four com- parison […]
TEST WITH HYPERLINKS
/0 Comments/in News /byClick here to go to Google.