And I hope any analysis done is all-in — you’ve got to count the capital cost of any new equipment plus factor in the maintenance of that equipment (or the reduced lifecycle if you don’t do it). Plus the overtime and/or lost productivity (for other tasks) of the state workers. Plus the fully-loaded costs (including bond interest and fringe benefits, whether or not we fund them properly) for any new employees.
As of 2007, it turns out that 6 of the 27 public transportation entities surveyed used private contractors. Massachusetts did not participate in the survey, sadly.
The entire MassDoT budget is laid out in 19 pages, so there’s no detail on this initiative. It’s difficult to believe that a comprehensive analysis would show any savings for the state.