Education Provisions of OBBB

Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

Two major education provisions of the One Big Beautiful Bill (OBBB), signed into law on July 4, 2025, garnered a lot of ink and debate—a federal School Choice Tax Credit and an excise tax on the investment income of private universities with large endowments.

So where did they come out?

The School Choice Tax Credit

The OBBB creates a new federal School Choice Tax Credit (IRC §25F) that allows individuals and corporations to receive a nonrefundable credit of up to $1,700 per student for donations to eligible scholarship-granting organizations (SGOs). Key features include:

Critics argue the program may disproportionately benefit higher-income families and donors, while drawing resources away from rural public schools, which rely heavily on state and federal funding and often lack accessible private alternatives (New America critique). Broader conservative support for the provision—rooted in the earlier Educational Choice for Children Act (H.R. 833)—is reflected in commentary from groups like the Commonwealth Foundation.

A tiered excise tax on private university endowments

The OBBB also replaces the existing flat 1.4% excise tax on private university endowments with a tiered rate structure based on a school’s student-adjusted endowment (SAE), defined as the fair market value of non-educational assets divided by student enrollment. The new rates are 4% for schools with SAE between $500,000 and $750,000; 6% for SAE between $750,000 and $2 million; and 8% for SAE exceeding $2 million. The tax continues to apply only to private universities, and assets held by related entities are counted toward the total.

The measure has raised concerns about its impact on private universities’ investment strategies and its potential to disincentivize long-term endowment growth.  Two hotly debated provisions were dropped:

  • One would have excluded non-citizen students from the SAE denominator, because Congress did not want to artificially inflate the per-student endowment to trigger tax liability.
  • The other was a proposed exemption for religious institutions.