Like most places, Massachusetts uses elections to insure accountability in government. Don’t like how things are being run? Vote’em out.
So, it’s interesting to note that some of the most egregious breakdowns in public accountability over the past few years have occurred in that netherworld between bureaucrats and elected officials — the board of directors.
To be sure, the private sector has struggled with how to insure the accountability of boards of directors, but the public sector seems to be far behind in this area.
What are the key indicators of weak governance? Review the peformance of the Essex Country Regional Retirement Board, the Chelsea Housing Authority Board, and the Merrimack Special Education Collaborative Board.
In each case, a board appointed by elected officials has egregiously failed to protect the public interest — either through ‘capture’ by a powerful chief executive or an inability or unwillingness to understand what exactly they were approving.
Massachusetts’ public sector governance is marbled through with hundreds of appointed boards designed to protect the public interest. If we can’t solve the seeming intrinsic weakness of this level of oversight, we risk wasting more of the taxpayers’ money.