Don’t Waste the Crisis over Common Core

12
shares
Share on Facebook
Share on Twitter
Share on
LinkedIn
+

The entire Common Core project is rapidly going south, and within two years may be no more than a dim memory of a nightmare in the minds of a growing army of angry parents and teachers from coast to coast. Before this dystopian scheme for upgrading the academic status of low-income children emerges in a more deadly form in a newly re-authorized Elementary and Secondary Education Act (ESEA), we could try to salvage one of the reasonable arguments for a “common core.” We could benefit from some research-based and internationally benchmarked common standards in elementary school reading, writing, and arithmetic across states.  But not up to grade 12. As educators in other countries and most parents everywhere know, many young adolescents don’t want to go to college or can’t do college coursework and would prefer other options. But common standards up to grade 8, with flexibility in the curriculum and in school organization for that educational wasteland known as middle or junior high school, make sense.

The first task is to relabel the currently toxic package as high school-ready standards and give the forthcoming “college readiness” tests not in grade 11 but in grade 8, which is where they better fit with respect to content and cut score. There, with additions by academic experts in each state to ensure adequate content knowledge is also assessed, they can serve as nationally recognized indications of whether students are capable of authentic high school-level work in grade 9.

It won’t take long for college faculty to realize that Common Core’s tests are a better indication of whether students can do authentic high school-level work in grade 9 than of college-level work. Few post-secondary institutions will survive the pretense that grade 6/7 reading and mathematical skills denote “college readiness.” No doctors or engineers can be developed if they are at that academic level in grade 11 or 12, even when fraudulently deemed “college-ready.” How many American communities can survive without a few doctors and engineers of their own?

Once common ELA and math standards serve to guide a curriculum that makes most students ready for real high school work by the end of grade 8, we can work out alternative high school curricula—the upper secondary options that appeal to a broad range of students even today—and give young adolescents a choice of the kind of curriculum they are willing to commit themselves to—with change always possible. This is what most developed countries do, including Finland.  Our aim would be to try to make sure that all students complete a basic education through grade 8, before compulsory schooling ends and before they choose their upper secondary curriculum.

Do not think I exaggerate our predicament.  At present, we are spending billions of dollars trying to send students to college and maintain them there when on average our high school students read at about the grade 6 or 7 level and their mathematical knowledge is not much higher—in comparison to their peers in high-achieving countries.  Two independent sources converge on that reading level: Renaissance Learning’s latest report on the average reading level of what our students in grades 9-12 read (whether assigned or chosen), and the average reading level of the books that colleges assign to incoming freshmen for summer reading (the titles can be found in the latest Beach Book report). As for mathematics, most high school graduates do not do much in mathematics beyond what students in high-achieving countries complete in algebra and geometry by the end of grade 8.  Common Core asks for little more than that by the end of grade 11.

A crisis is a terrible thing to waste, as we have been regularly told.  And here’s one we should take advantage of in order to salvage a battered public school system. If we don’t come to grips with Common Core’s notion of “college readiness,” we face dissolution of our entire education system. And there are other English-speaking post-secondary institutions outside of this country eager for students who can do high school-level reading and mathematics.

Sandra Stotsky was Senior Associate Commissioner in the Massachusetts Department of Education in 1999-2003 and responsible for its K-12 standards in all major subjects.  She was also a member of Common Core’s Validation Committee.

 

3 replies
  1. Yana7
    Yana7 says:

    With all due respect to Sandra Stotsky, changing the grades in which the college readiness equation is done, doesn’t change the nature of the beast and it’s many heads. When I was in High School and we had three courses of study we could take, Academic, Commercial or General; I would have been flipping pancakes now if I had followed their line of thinking. The whole point is NOT to pigeon hole our kids. To offer them the best education we have to offer…which by the way…is what this country had been doing for a long time now…regardless of the naysayers who keep screwing it up, telling us that we are not as good as other countries in educating our children. Remember the Russian Sputnik and how we took ourselves over the coals for not being ahead of the Russians in science education? Damn, we did darn good with our space program. We did darn good with our technology innovations until Bill Gates decided to make being a “god” his hobby. We’ve done very well in medicine, etc,. So “somebody” decided that we needed Common Core to change everything, even what was not broken. Now, to nudge a bad idea into a not as bad idea is not the answer. The answer is in strengthening what has worked in so many places and areas of education and to change the places and education areas that are, in fact, broken. Nothing that equalizes everything for everybody has ever worked in history…except here, when individual freedom is allowed to flourish!

  2. Darcy
    Darcy says:

    The thought that my children will have been labeled “non-college material” by the time they reach 8th grade is more frightening than common core. No. And if it means I have to quit my profession to home school my children to save them from this insanity, then I will do it.

  3. wabby99
    wabby99 says:

    So basically we are now being told that Common Core is ok but should just be labeled High School ready instead of College and Career ready? WOW. I am blown away by this. The problem with Common Core/RTTT/Education Reform in America is much more than Common Core Standards. I totally disagree with the points in this article. We MUST not only get rid of Common Core we need to repeal ALL of Race To The Top. Then we need to shut out the lights on the US Dept. of Education. As long as that department remains solvent we will continue to realize the decline of education.

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *